Re: Problem with disk replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:46:22 +0800 (CST) qindehua <13691222965@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Neil,
> I use kernel 3.9.6 and found data may lost while replacing a RAID disk using --replace.
> 
> Here is the steps of the test case:
> 1. Create 3-drives RAID5 and wait for resync done (I use 1GB disks in VirtualBox machine)
> 2. Calculate the md5sum on the whole raid: dd if=/dev/md1 bs=1M iflag=direct | md5sum
> 3. add two spare disks to the raid: mdadm /dev/md1 -a /dev/sdi -a /dev/sdj
> 4. mdadm --replace a disk then --fail another disk:
>    mdadm /dev/md1 --replace /dev/sdb; sleep 3; mdadm /dev/md1 -f /dev/sdc
> 5. wait for recovery done
> 6. recalculate the md5sum on the whole raid: dd if=/dev/md1 bs=1M iflag=direct | md5sum
> 
> The md5sum of step 6 is NOT identical with that of step 2, this means data is corrupted.
> I found in step 4, when another disk was made failed, the replacing process was stopped,
> and started recovering of the failed disk, and afterwards the replacing not continue.

Hi Qin,
 thanks for the report.  I can easily reproduce the bug.

I think this will fix it.  Could you please test and confirm that it fixes
the problem for you too.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:57:21 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: fix interaction of 'replace' and 'recovery'.

If a device in a RAID4/5/6 is being replaced while another is being
recovered, then the writes to the replacement device currently don't
happen, resulting in corruption when the replacement completes and the
new drive takes over.

This is because the replacement writes are only triggered when
's.replacing' is set and not when the similar 's.sync' is set (which
is the case during resync and recovery - it means all devices need to
be read).

So schedule those writes when s.replacing is set as well.

In this case we cannot use "STRIPE_INSYNC" to record that the
replacement has happened as that is needed for recording that any
parity calculation is complete.  So introduce STRIPE_REPLACED to
record if the replacement has happened.

This bug was introduced in commit 9a3e1101b827a59ac9036a672f5fa8d5279d0fe2
(md/raid5:  detect and handle replacements during recovery.)
which introduced replacement for raid5.
That was in 3.3-rc3, so any stable kernel since then would benefit
from this fix.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (3.3+)
Reported-by: qindehua <13691222965@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 2bf094a..f0aa7abd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3607,8 +3607,8 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
 			handle_parity_checks5(conf, sh, &s, disks);
 	}
 
-	if (s.replacing && s.locked == 0
-	    && !test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state)) {
+	if ((s.replacing || s.syncing) && s.locked == 0
+	    && !test_bit(STRIPE_REPLACED, &sh->state)) {
 		/* Write out to replacement devices where possible */
 		for (i = 0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++)
 			if (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[i].flags) &&
@@ -3617,7 +3617,9 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
 				set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
 				s.locked++;
 			}
-		set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
+		if (s.replacing)
+			set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
+		set_bit(STRIPE_REPLACED, &sh->state);
 	}
 	if ((s.syncing || s.replacing) && s.locked == 0 &&
 	    test_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state)) {
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index b0b663b..70c4932 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ enum {
 	STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED,
 	STRIPE_SYNCING,
 	STRIPE_INSYNC,
+	STRIPE_REPLACED,
 	STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE,
 	STRIPE_DELAYED,
 	STRIPE_DEGRADED,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux