On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:12:50AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: [...] > Fair enough. I was thinking in the context of making raid6check part of the > default install. I wouldn't want to do that until it was more "user > friendly". I also wouldn't want to do it until he code had stabilized. So > your idea fits perfectly. Hi Neil, seems reasonable, this discussion was exactly triggered in order to understand what is missing and what should be done for "raid6check" in order to be part of the official "mdadm" binary set. So, to sum it up: 1) 4K block size resolution for processing 2) Verbosity under controll I guess these are the open points. Thanks, bye, pg > Thanks, > NeilBrown > -- piergiorgio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
