Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/18/2013 5:05 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a good explanation of the read performance impact
> of small (RAID-5 and RAID-6) chunk sizes?

Can you elaborate on your workload that demonstrates this?  Different
workloads behave differently with different chunk sizes.

> I understand why large chunks hurt write performance...

Again this is workload dependent.  Large chunks increase write and read
performance for large streaming workloads.

> The "read penalty" is definitely there; I can see it in the test data
> from my NAS.  I just don't understand *why* it's there.

If you can see it, then please demonstrate this read penalty with
numbers.  You obviously have test data from the same set of disks with
two different RAID5s of different chunk sizes.  This is required to see
such a difference in performance.  Please share this data with us.

-- 
Stan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux