Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i'm not sure, but maybe the problem is the same of small chunk size of raid-0
the head move a lot for small works, while it could move less and do many job

but i'm not sure about it

2013/8/18 Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Can anyone point me to a good explanation of the read performance impact
> of small (RAID-5 and RAID-6) chunk sizes?
>
> I understand why large chunks hurt write performance, but I haven't been
> able to reason through the small-chunk/read case, and my Interweb
> searches haven't really turned anything up.
>
> The "read penalty" is definitely there; I can see it in the test data
> from my NAS.  I just don't understand *why* it's there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> ========================================================================
> Ian Pilcher                                         arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx
> Sometimes there's nothing left to do but crash and burn...or die trying.
> ========================================================================
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Roberto Spadim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux