Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Wes wrote:

Why raid10 driver from Centos 6 has a 300% slower random write performance
(random read stays the same) than Centos 5?

Please share your ideas.

If my research is correct, centos5 is 2.6.18 kernel and centos6 is 2.6.32 kernel?

So just guessing, although my experience with this was from using a filesystem which it seems you are not doing?

https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/writebarr.html
http://monolight.cc/2011/06/barriers-caches-filesystems/

Does seekmark use barriers to assure that data has actually been written? In that case it could be that 2.6.18 has different behaviour from 2.6.32 when it comes to barriers and that explains the speed difference.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux