Re: Help with failed RAID-5 -> 6 migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Using Keith Phillips' reported output from /proc/mdstat and mdadm
--detail, I have a question:

/proc/mdstat says that the array is "inactive":

>>---------------------------
>> Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5]
>> [raid4] [raid10]
>> md0 : inactive sde[4] sdc[1] sdb[0] sdd[3]
>>       7814054240 blocks super 1.2
>> 
>> unused devices: <none>
>> ---------------------------

But mdadm --detail says

>>           State : active, degraded, Not Started

and goes on to show that the array is rebuilding using the spare. So, how
can it be both "inactive" and "active", and be rebuilding but "Not
Started"? 

I think this is just my un-clarity concerning what these terms mean.

Thanks!

---
Mike VanHorn
Senior Computer Systems Administrator
College of Engineering and Computer Science
Wright State University
265 Russ Engineering Center
937-775-5157
michael.vanhorn@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.cecs.wright.edu/~mvanhorn/




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux