On 06/12/2013 08:10 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > Promising - thanks. > > However should we do the same thing in raid5.c too? As far as I can > tell, the default set by blk_set_stacking_limits() (which md calls) > is to allow WRITE_SAME if all all underlying devices do. But I'm > pretty sure raid5 will do the wrong thing with a WRITE_SAME > request. > Yes, if raid5 also bounces the array if the WRITE SAME request fails at the device we need to do the same thing there. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
