Re: RAID-10 keeps aborting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "hpa" == H Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

hpa> Yuck, this suddenly got complex.  Perhaps WRITE SAME should simply
hpa> be disabled on raid1/raid10 until this can be addressed?  

Yeah, maybe.


hpa> Do we need to do the same for DISCARD?

For discard we have better heuristics from the device so the partial
completion case should be rare. But obviously a disk can reject a
command anytime with or without reason...

Also, discard is advisory. There is no guarantee that a pair of mirrored
drives will be consistent in the discarded region (unless the drives
promise to zero discarded blocks but MD doesn't check that for
raid1/raid10).

WRITE SAME requires strict consistency between the devices, however. So
it looks like there's some work that needs to be done in that
department.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux