Re: Aren't 2TB+ disk sizes supposed to be standardized?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Tudor Holton wrote:

These are from the same manufacturer! Interestingly, the larger drive is actually the older one!

I checked my drives, and all my 2TB drives are:

User Capacity:    2 000 398 934 016 bytes [2,00 TB]

Is the "standardization" not a fixed value but a minimum? If so, what is that actual minimum? If it's an actual 2 terabyte (2x10^12), then I suppose they're both technically over, but that means that we can't just simply create partitions that fill the space and expect to be able to transfer them later. :-(

Are you sure smartctl actually reads from the drive and doesn't query the controller? Only thing I can think of is that sdc sits on a controller that puts in a superblock between the OS and the drive, and thus truncates the size you can use.

2000397852160-2000398934016
-1081856
1081856/4096
264.125

However, it's a really odd size difference.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux