On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:10:54 +0200 Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:57 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:33:53 +0200 Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 09/27/2013 05:47 PM, Francis Moreau wrote: > >> > >> > I finally found my issue: mdmon --takeover service wasn't started > >> > anymore (probably I messed it up earlier). Therefore mdmon started by > >> > initrd was used and wasn't working properly. > >> > >> Thanks a lot for finding this out, glad your system is working again. > >> And sorry for having lost you and talking about the BIOS; I was thinking > >> you were still working on fake BIOS hardware. > >> > >> > If you still want me to test something, please tell me. > >> > > >> > OTHO, it would be easier if you setup a git tree somewhere with your > >> > patches that you want me to test. BTW I'm not subscribed to linux-raid > >> > mailing list. > >> > >> I'll wait for Neil to come back and comment on my patches. It doesn't > >> make sense for me right now to create my own repository. > > > > Hi, > > I'm back from leave now :-) > > Your patches look good - thanks a lots. > > I think I have applied them all (though the numbering was a bit odd and I > > might have missed something). > > > > I've lost track ... are there any outstanding issues here, or are we "done" ? > > > > I think there's still one open issue when sequence numbers don't match during > incremental assembly. > > Martin started addressing this in another new thread whose subject is > "RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't > match" > > Ah yes, thanks. I had a quick look and it seems to make sense, but it deserves more thorough consideration. I'll get on to that sometime soon. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
