Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Hi Phil,

Thank you for all the great help so far!

> Yes, that dmesg did the trick.  The drive that failed first was #3, and
> the drive the failed second was #4.  You should create a list of which
> drive serial number corresponds to which raid device role, with a third
> column showing the current device name.

Serial no:              old name  ID     current name
WD-WCC1T1255024                     /dev/sdc1  new drive
W1F09XLV            /dev/sdb1 [3]    /dev/sdd1  failed drive 1
W1F0AXTQ           /dev/sdc1 [4]    /dev/sde1  failed drive 2
W1F0B6X6            /dev/sdd1 [0]    /dev/sdf1
S1F04BZT             /dev/sde1 [5]    /dev/sdg1
W1F0B9ER           /dev/sdf1 [2]    /dev/sdh1
WD-WMC1T2341606    /dev/sdg1 [1]    /dev/sdi1
S1F04CWH           /dev/sdh1 [6]    /dev/sdj1  (partially rebuild spare)

> Then, to deal with the large number of pending events, you'll need to do
> a "check" scrub with a very low speed limit.  To keep you from exceeding
> the 10/hour read error limit in the MD kernel driver.

echo 1000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min
echo 10000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
echo check > /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action

Would this be ok in such a case?

Karel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux