Re: Triple parity and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24-11-13 22:13, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I freely admit I may have drawn an incorrect conclusion about md parity rebuild performance based on incomplete data. I simply don't recall anyone stating here in ~3 years that their parity rebuilds were speedy, but quite the opposite. I guess it's possible that each one of those cases was due to another factor, such as user load, slow CPU, bus bottleneck, wonky disk firmware, backplane issues, etc.
The other part to this is, that the list sees what goes wrong. The cases where a replacement goes smoothly do not reach the list

Cheers,


Rudy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux