On 24-11-13 22:13, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I freely admit I may have drawn an incorrect conclusion about md
parity rebuild performance based on incomplete data. I simply don't
recall anyone stating here in ~3 years that their parity rebuilds were
speedy, but quite the opposite. I guess it's possible that each one of
those cases was due to another factor, such as user load, slow CPU,
bus bottleneck, wonky disk firmware, backplane issues, etc.
The other part to this is, that the list sees what goes wrong. The cases
where a replacement goes smoothly do not reach the list
Cheers,
Rudy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html