Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/24/2013 03:14 PM, Karel Walters wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>> Ok, so your create operation will be:
>>
>> mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=10 -n 6 --layout=f2 --chunk=64
>> --data-offset=variable /dev/sdd1:2048 /dev/sdg1:4096 /dev/sdf1:2048
>> /dev/sdb1:2048 /dev/sdc1:2048 /dev/sde1:2048
> 
> No --assume-clean?

Whoops!  Yes, add the --assume-clean.

>> I'm actually guessing that /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdc1 need offset 2048 like
>> the original devices, not the 4096 of a device added later (newer
>> mdadm).  With the mixed offsets, you need mdadm version 3.3.
> 
> I created and used it this with mdadm 3.2.5, do I really need to get 3.3?

Yes, 3.2.5 doesn't have the variable offset syntax.

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux