Linux RAID Storage Date Index
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df2f2/df2f2a5779fb6d5d09f9f822adb08625e2a87275" alt=""
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Need Advice regarding chunk size of RAID6 regarding HFS+
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Need Advice regarding chunk size of RAID6 regarding HFS+
- From: Florian Lampel <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 replace ignored error?
- From: Bill <billstuff2001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: AW: AW: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 replace ignored error?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: AW: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: AW: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm assemble bug?
- From: Eivind Sarto <eivindsarto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: "Bakk. Florian Lampel" <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Florian Lampel <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Florian Lampel <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Florian Lampel <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Andrew Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 dead on the water after Controller failure
- From: Florian Lampel <florian.lampel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Andrew Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Z87 vs ASMedia
- From: Raul Dias <raul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Andrew Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Andrew Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- sector mapping
- From: Larry Fenske <LFenske@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid 6 rebuild
- From: Chris Murphy <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 6 rebuild
- From: "Gallas, William N" <william.n.gallas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
- From: Andrew Martin <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] md/raid5: allow resync-rebuild requests to run multi-threaded
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] md/raid5: allow resync-rebuild requests to run multi-threaded
- From: Eivind Sarto <eivindsarto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reassemble Raid 6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- md/raid5.c and STRIPE_IO_STARTED
- From: Eivind Sarto <eivindsarto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re[2]: Reassemble Raid 6
- From: "Justin Stephenson" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reassemble Raid 6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reassemble Raid 6
- From: "Justin Stephenson" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bug#737951: mdadm: udev rules files ignores raid=noautodetect kernel parameter
- From: Michael Prokop <mika@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 caught in rebuild loop
- From: Benedikt Fraunhofer <benedikt.fraunhofer.lists.mdadm.67B-ACM@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bug#737951: mdadm: udev rules files ignores raid=noautodetect kernel parameter
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intent Bitmap size and performance
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Storage system
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intent Bitmap size and performance
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 45/51] md, raid5: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Storage system
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 recovery of missing MBR and md superblocks
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 45/51] md, raid5: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 45/51] md, raid5: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c: reduce verbosity
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 45/51] md, raid5: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c: reduce verbosity
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm, raid 6 best options if any?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Larry Fenske <LFenske@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 replace ignored error?
- From: Bill <billstuff2001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c: reduce verbosity
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH resend 1/2] bcache: Use %zi to format size_t
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] bcache: Drop L-suffix when comparing ssize_t with 0
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH resend 1/2] bcache: Use %zi to format size_t
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- SOLVED - Re: md raid0 with overwritten superblock on 1/4 disks
- From: travis+ml-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- md raid0 with overwritten superblock on 1/4 disks
- From: travis+ml-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair does not repair errors?
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Intent Bitmap size and performance
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Intent Bitmap size and performance
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Intent Bitmap size and performance
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c: add O_SYNC to open
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c: fix Q parity generation
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c: fix position printout
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c: reduce verbosity
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dm-raid: check events in super_validate
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAIS5 Rebuild Help - Possible Data Offset
- From: Yorik <yoriks13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Soft RAID and EFI systems
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAIS5 Rebuild Help - Possible Data Offset
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Boot fails from one of the drives cos it's not an ext4 filesystem.
- From: Richard Gomes <rgomes.info@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Boot fails from one of the drives cos it's not an ext4 filesystem.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md hang on updating bitmap
- From: Marcus <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Boot fails from one of the drives cos it's not an ext4 filesystem.
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Boot fails from one of the drives cos it's not an ext4 filesystem.
- From: Richard Gomes <rgomes.info@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] block devices: validate block device capacity
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 caught in rebuild loop
- From: Benedikt Fraunhofer <benedikt.fraunhofer.lists.mdadm.67B-ACM@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: non-persistent superblocks? [WORKAROUND]
- From: Chris Schanzle <mdadm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAIS5 Rebuild Help - Possible Data Offset
- From: Yorik <yoriks13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 Rebuild Issue - Data Offset possibly
- From: Yorik <yoriks13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: AW: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- AW: AW: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: non-persistent superblocks?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- non-persistent superblocks?
- From: Chris Schanzle <mdadm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequential versus random I/O
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sequential versus random I/O
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: Maurizio De Santis <m.desantis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid recovery - raid5 - one active, two spares
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid recovery - raid5 - one active, two spares
- From: Mariusz Zalewski <mariusz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: "Samer, Michael (I/ET-83, extern)" <extern.michael.samer@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [HELP] Recover a RAID5 with 8 drives
- From: Maurizio De Santis <m.desantis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Questions regarding bad block management
- From: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- md hang on updating bitmap
- From: admin <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v4 3/3] crypto: async_tx: Extends crypto/async_tx to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v4 2/3] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v4 0/3] lib: raid: New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: "George Spelvin" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: Matt Garman <matthew.garman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: "George Spelvin" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- Why are reads not balanced across my RAID-1?
- From: "George Spelvin" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL REQUEST] md updates for 3.14
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c: remove legacy code
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- LVM raid1 mirror: interrupted resync isn't handled well
- From: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Opal 2.0 SEDs on linux, was: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Ethan Wilson <ethan.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disappointing performance: 5-disk RAID6, 3.11.6
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Manually reconstruct a RAID10 from adaptec 3805
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disappointing performance: 5-disk RAID6, 3.11.6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disappointing performance: 5-disk RAID6, 3.11.6
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Allow to check mdadm with clangs static checker (scan-build)
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disappointing performance: 5-disk RAID6, 3.11.6
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Disappointing performance: 5-disk RAID6, 3.11.6
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Manually reconstruct a RAID10 from adaptec 3805
- From: Raul Dias <raul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Very long raid5 init/rebuild times
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Manually reconstruct a RAID10 from adaptec 3805
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: Add compensation in sysfs for raid456.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Allow to check mdadm with clangs static checker (scan-build)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Questions about bitrot and RAID 5/6
- From: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Manually reconstruct a RAID10 from adaptec 3805
- From: Raul Dias <raul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Allow to check mdadm with clangs static checker (scan-build)
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] at drivers/md/raid5.c:291! kernel 3.13-rc8
- From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- If separate md for /boot, OS, and /srv, must 'create' on disks with 3 partns?
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid recovery - raid5 - one active, two spares
- From: Mariusz Zalewski <mariusz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problems with block sizes in raid 5
- From: Martin Bruse <zondolfin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid6check.c add page size check and repair
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- problems with block sizes in raid 5
- From: Martin Bruse <zondolfin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid recovery - raid5 - one active, two spares
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid recovery - raid5 - one active, two spares
- From: Mariusz Zalewski <mariusz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bitmap does not account for write errors prior to kicking?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: check command validity early in md_ioctl().
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bitmap does not account for write errors prior to kicking?
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bitmap does not account for write errors prior to kicking?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: check command validity early in md_ioctl().
- From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Bitmap does not account for write errors prior to kicking?
- From: Ethan Wilson <ethan.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livelock during MD device open
- From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL REQUEST] last minute md fixes for 3.13
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: livelock during MD device open
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- livelock during MD device open
- From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- AW: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: Add compensation in sysfs for raid456.
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid5: Add compensation in sysfs for raid456.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 2/3] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 3/3] crypto: async_tx: Extends crypto/async_tx to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 0/3] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] bcache: Fix sparse non static symbol warning
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Copying Data off a Failed RAID
- From: Fred Damstra <fred.damstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- write-mostly
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 unmountable defective md superblocks
- From: Michael Samer <michael.samer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] lib: raid: New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] lib: raid: New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCHv3 04/11] dm: Use VMALLOC_TOTAL instead of VMALLCO_END - VMALLOC_START
- From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re:: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Intel Matrix raid recovery with 2 raid volumes in the array
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 6 4 disk failure, improper --create leads to bad superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid 6 4 disk failure, improper --create leads to bad superblock
- From: Cooper tron <cooper@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low resync throughput
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: raid10 offset distance
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Low resync throughput
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 offset distance
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- thank you!
- From: "N Laszlo Frazer" <laszlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm, spin down never happens, do spare work the same?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm, spin down never happens, do spare work the same?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: raid5 + dm-crypt WRITE perf., higher rrqm/s - kernel 3.10.16
- From: Redwood Hyd <redwoodhyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Nikolaus Jeremic <jeremic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 + dm-crypt WRITE perf., higher rrqm/s - kernel 3.10.16
- From: Redwood Hyd <redwoodhyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm error
- From: Michael Samer <michael.samer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: two raid5 performance
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 6 performs unnecessary reads when updating single chunk in a stripe
- From: Nikolaus Jeremic <jeremic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Ken Drummond <linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Mark the function btree_insert_fn() as static in btree.c
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: Mark the function btree_insert_fn() as static in btree.c
- From: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Chris Green <cgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VM virtual hard drive with build and debug all ready to go?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- VM virtual hard drive with build and debug all ready to go?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH mdadm 1/1] Clarify scope of Rebuild events in mdadm manpage
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm and the list appreciation
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to? a thank you.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- replaced disk raid 5 array, after sync, missing file system and/or superblock
- From: Niels Wassenberg <nielswassenberg@xxxxxx>
- Is mdadm guaranteed consistent after a sync/xfs_freeze?
- From: Jon Eisenstein <eisenstein@xxxxxxxxx>
- adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: Tomas Agartz <tlund@xxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: Hai Wu <haiwu.us@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: Tomas Agartz <tlund@xxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm rebuild
- From: Hai Wu <haiwu.us@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: Patrick Smears <patrick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: Patrick Smears <patrick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Idea: reduce SCST processes per LUN
- From: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Phill Watkins <phill.watkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib/raid6: fix preprocessor warning
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Phill Watkins <phill.watkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 rmmod bug oops
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid5 rmmod bug oops
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]