Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: livelock during MD device open
- From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL REQUEST] last minute md fixes for 3.13
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: livelock during MD device open
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- livelock during MD device open
- From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- AW: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: Add compensation in sysfs for raid456.
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid5: Add compensation in sysfs for raid456.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- After RAID0 grow: inconsistent superblocks and /proc/mdstat
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- read errors not corrected when doing check on RAID6
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm expanded 8 disk raid 6 fails in new server, 5 original devices show no md superblock
- From: Großkreutz, Julian <Julian.Grosskreutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD on raw device, use unallocated space anyway?
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 2/3] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 3/3] crypto: async_tx: Extends crypto/async_tx to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 0/3] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] bcache: Fix sparse non static symbol warning
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Copying Data off a Failed RAID
- From: Fred Damstra <fred.damstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- write-mostly
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- QNAP 8 port RAID5 md0 unmountable defective md superblocks
- From: Michael Samer <michael.samer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] lib: raid: New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] lib: raid: New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 2/2] fs: btrfs: Extends btrfs/raid56 to support up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 0/2] New RAID library supporting up to six parities
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Looking for some advice on best way to identify drives / recover from issues
- From: Dylan Distasio <interzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 'resync=PENDING', 'auto-read-only' on raid1 creation
- From: Ron Leach <ronleach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks
- From: Fabian Knorr <knorrfab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 reshape integer problem
- From: Piotr Klimek <piotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why 4k native drives haven't arrived
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCHv3 04/11] dm: Use VMALLOC_TOTAL instead of VMALLCO_END - VMALLOC_START
- From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- looking for advice on raid0+raid5 array recovery with mdadm and sector offset
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: R5_WriteError is not cleared after rdev is marked as Faulty
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re:: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Looking for help how to migrate 2disk RAID1 to 3 disk RAID6
- From: Krzysztof Adamski <k-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to prefer some devices over others in raid
- From: Tomas M <tomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- Re: The chunk size paradox
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- The chunk size paradox
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Intel Matrix raid recovery with 2 raid volumes in the array
- From: den Hoog <speedyden@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Doesn't "writes" do what resync does ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 6 4 disk failure, improper --create leads to bad superblock
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can raid1-resync cause a corruption?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid 6 4 disk failure, improper --create leads to bad superblock
- From: Cooper tron <cooper@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low resync throughput
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: raid10 offset distance
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Low resync throughput
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 offset distance
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- thank you!
- From: "N Laszlo Frazer" <laszlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- More 'D' state processes [was: Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks]
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Weird problem: mdadm blocks
- From: Hans Kraus <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- md-RAID5/6 stripe_cache_size default value vs performance vs memory footprint
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm, spin down never happens, do spare work the same?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm, spin down never happens, do spare work the same?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] policy: NULL path isn't really acceptable - use the devname
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Is it possible to create a raid from/over other raids?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: raid5 + dm-crypt WRITE perf., higher rrqm/s - kernel 3.10.16
- From: Redwood Hyd <redwoodhyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Chunk size change stop/restart
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 6 reads all remaining chunks in a stripe when a single chunk is rewritten
- From: Nikolaus Jeremic <jeremic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- What can be used instead of /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 + dm-crypt WRITE perf., higher rrqm/s - kernel 3.10.16
- From: Redwood Hyd <redwoodhyd@xxxxxxxxx>
- request help with RAID1 array that endlessly attempts to sync
- From: Julie Ashworth <ashworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm error
- From: Michael Samer <michael.samer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@xxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Dag Nygren <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: two raid5 performance
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- two raid5 performance
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 6 performs unnecessary reads when updating single chunk in a stripe
- From: Nikolaus Jeremic <jeremic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Ken Drummond <linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: md: Mark the function btree_insert_fn() as static in btree.c
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: md: Mark the function btree_insert_fn() as static in btree.c
- From: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help with degraded array
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help with degraded array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Chris Green <cgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
- From: Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VM virtual hard drive with build and debug all ready to go?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- VM virtual hard drive with build and debug all ready to go?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH mdadm 1/1] Clarify scope of Rebuild events in mdadm manpage
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- udev rule and systemd unit files and mdadm - cross distro.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm and the list appreciation
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to? a thank you.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Rebuild events while scrubbing - problems or just informational?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- replaced disk raid 5 array, after sync, missing file system and/or superblock
- From: Niels Wassenberg <nielswassenberg@xxxxxx>
- Is mdadm guaranteed consistent after a sync/xfs_freeze?
- From: Jon Eisenstein <eisenstein@xxxxxxxxx>
- adding a missing drive(s), which drives get written to?
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: Tomas Agartz <tlund@xxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [SOLVED] Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- unable to assemble (mostly?) clean array
- From: Christopher Hoover <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: Hai Wu <haiwu.us@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- How to assemble 4-disk raid5 with one broken disk and one marked as spare by operator error?
- From: Tomas Agartz <tlund@xxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm rebuild
- From: Hai Wu <haiwu.us@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid1 where Event Count off my 1 cannot assemble --force
- From: "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: Patrick Smears <patrick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- mdadm fails to recognise DDF partitions from Marvell MV64460 controller
- From: Patrick Smears <patrick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Idea: reduce SCST processes per LUN
- From: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Phill Watkins <phill.watkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID-0/5/6 performances
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib/raid6: fix preprocessor warning
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- accidently pulled to many devices, raid6 wont start.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Degraded array but drive healthy
- From: Phill Watkins <phill.watkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 rmmod bug oops
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid5 rmmod bug oops
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Tom Pfeifer <tpfeife1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG,PATCH] raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Lars Täuber <taeuber@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Richard Scobie <r.scobie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:答复:md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Converting from Raid 5 to 6
- From: Michael Busby <michael.a.busby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thanks Neil
- From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Thanks Neil
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:答复:md raid5 random performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: Teitur Ingi Sigurdsson <teitso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- cgroups-blkio CFQ scheduling does not work well in a RAID5 configuration.
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] bcache: fix sparse non static symbol warning
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复:md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid5 performace 6x SSD RAID5
- From: "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dm-raid45?
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dm-raid45?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid10 multi core scaling
- From: Pedro Teixeira <finas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID Performance - 5x SSD RAID5
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Slow AVX XOR reported
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stuck reshape
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: Use conf->device_lock protect changing of multi-thread resources.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stuck reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] MD/DM RAID: Fix hang due to recent RAID5 locking changes
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/1] Recent breakage of DM RAID
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx>
- Stuck reshape
- From: Larkin Lowrey <llowrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Revert "raid5: make release_stripe lockless" because it causes test regression
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: Use conf->device_lock protect changing of multi-thread resources.
- From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Taylor <davidt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- ARC-1120 and MD very sloooow
- From: Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm No md superblock detected
- From: Teitur Ingi Sigurdsson <teitso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- raid1 behind write ordering (barrier) protection
- From: Brett Russ <brett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Growing array, duplicating data, shrinking array questions.
- From: Wilson Jonathan <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is there a tool to examine raw metadata?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: James Plank <plank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- unused space before data offset mismatch
- From: kustep <kustep@xxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is there a tool to examine raw metadata?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: James Plank <plank@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: John Williams <jwilliams4200@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md updates for 3.13
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is my drive dying ?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is my drive dying ?
- From: Guillaume Betous <guillaume.betous@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Triple parity and beyond
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Triple parity and beyond
- From: Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MDADM 3.3 broken?
- From: "David F." <df7729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
- From: Martin Boutin <martboutin@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: "reshape: not enough stripes. Needed 65536"
- From: "Steven Rose [DATACOM]" <Steven.Rose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- multiple device failure of mdadm array
- From: kustep <kustep@xxxxxx>
- Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- dmaengine 3.13 v2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH -next] dm cache policy mq:: use list_del_init instead of list_del/INIT_LIST_HEAD
- From: Joe Thornber <thornber@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] dm cache policy mq:: use list_del_init instead of list_del/INIT_LIST_HEAD
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- /proc/mdstat status documentation and md: export_rdev
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- kernel panic with bitmap_startwrite
- Re: mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] ioatdma: 16-source operation fixes
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] raid6test: add new corner case for ioatdma driver
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] ioatdma: clean up sed pool kmem_cache
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] ioatdma: fix selection of 16 vs 8 source path
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] ioatdma: fix sed pool selection
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] ioatdma: 16-source operation fixes
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm --fail requires writeable drive.
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix oops when changed group_thread_cnt
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Giovanni Tessore <giotex@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] raid5: Using conf->device_lock protect multi-thread resouce when changed.
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] raid5: Before freeing old multi-thread worker,it should flush them.
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] raid5: Before freeing old multi-thread worker,it should flush them.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] raid5: Using conf->device_lock protect multi-thread resouce when changed.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix oops when changed group_thread_cnt
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: sending ioctl [1261|800c0910] to a partition!
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm: sending ioctl [1261|800c0910] to a partition!
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.12: raid-1 mismatch_cnt question
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- recommending RAID6 over RAID5 when doing mdadm --create
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- stoppind md from kicking out "bad' drives
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running check and e2fsck simultaneously
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive (out of 2).
- From: Ivan Lezhnjov IV <ivan.lezhnjov.iv@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]