Re: Recovering an Array with inconsistent Superblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2014 12:59 PM, Can Jeuleers wrote:
> On 01/04/2014 05:24 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
>> Side note: If you have a live spare available for a raid5, there's no
>> good reason not to reshape to a raid6, and very good reasons to do so.
> 
> I used to have a setup like that (i.e. RAID5 + spare), and my reason was
> power consumption and heat dissipation, since the spare was spun down.

Ok.  I can understand that.  It wouldn't meet *my* definition of a
"good" reason, though.

Phil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux