答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes,I test like what  you say,but the result is the same.


------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 20:45
收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
抄 送:linux-raid Raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
主 题:Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance

try this, this will put a dd on different cores so that you don't
starve one core with both dd processes
taskset 1 dd if=/dev/zero of=raidset1
taskset 2 dd if=/dev/zero of=raidset2

2013/12/16 lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> In dd test,I use Linux top tools,and I found 2 raid use different cores, CPU  occupancy of each raid5 reach to 80% , is any lock contention  between two raid?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 发件人:Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 16:13
> 收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 抄 送:Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-raid Raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 主 题:Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
>
> Try to use taskset command to make sure the dd commands are handled by different cores otherwise you'll starve 1 core.
> On Dec 16, 2013 8:58 AM, "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> the disks involved in the array is sTEC ssd disk,they are connected by mpt2sas 6Gb/s
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 发件人:Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 15:52
>
> 收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>; unlisted-recipients: <unlisted-recipients:>
>
> 抄 送:linux-raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 主 题:Re: two raid5 performance
>
>
>
> On 16/12/2013 14:07, lilofile wrote:
>
>> when I Create a raid5,dd  1M block size,the performance can reached to 1GB/s
>
>> when I create another raid5,dd 1M block size ,the performance can reached to 1GB/s
>
>> when I simultaneously dd the two different raid,the total performance only reached to 1.4GB/s,why can not reached to 2GB/s.
>
>>
>
>> the memory is 32GB,CPU is x5660,the stripe size is 4096
>
>> --
>
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> What is the disks involved in the array ? How are they connected ?
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>



-- 

/Tommy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux