Re: 答复:答复:答复:two raid5 performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



what sort of controller do you have and how is it connected ?
are you testing on a filesystem or directly at the md device ?

2013/12/16 lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes,I test like what  you say,but the result is the same.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 发件人:Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
> 发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 20:45
> 收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 抄 送:linux-raid Raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 主 题:Re: 答复:答复:two raid5 performance
>
> try this, this will put a dd on different cores so that you don't
> starve one core with both dd processes
> taskset 1 dd if=/dev/zero of=raidset1
> taskset 2 dd if=/dev/zero of=raidset2
>
> 2013/12/16 lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> In dd test,I use Linux top tools,and I found 2 raid use different cores, CPU  occupancy of each raid5 reach to 80% , is any lock contention  between two raid?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 发件人:Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 16:13
>> 收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 抄 送:Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-raid Raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 主 题:Re: 答复:two raid5 performance
>>
>> Try to use taskset command to make sure the dd commands are handled by different cores otherwise you'll starve 1 core.
>> On Dec 16, 2013 8:58 AM, "lilofile" <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> the disks involved in the array is sTEC ssd disk,they are connected by mpt2sas 6Gb/s
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 发件人:Pieter De Wit <pieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> 发送时间:2013年12月16日(星期一) 15:52
>>
>> 收件人:lilofile <lilofile@xxxxxxxxxx>; unlisted-recipients: <unlisted-recipients:>
>>
>> 抄 送:linux-raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> 主 题:Re: two raid5 performance
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16/12/2013 14:07, lilofile wrote:
>>
>>> when I Create a raid5,dd  1M block size,the performance can reached to 1GB/s
>>
>>> when I create another raid5,dd 1M block size ,the performance can reached to 1GB/s
>>
>>> when I simultaneously dd the two different raid,the total performance only reached to 1.4GB/s,why can not reached to 2GB/s.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> the memory is 32GB,CPU is x5660,the stripe size is 4096
>>
>>> --
>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>>
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>> What is the disks involved in the array ? How are they connected ?
>>
>> --
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>>
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> /Tommy



-- 

/Tommy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux