Re: RAID 10 far and offset on-disk layouts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, so let recap:

1) FAR layout is the one depicted by SuSe documentation, while the
Wikipedia entry is wrong

Yes.


2) MD _can_ produce a FAR layout as depicted by Wikipedia, but we don't
know how the user-space mdadm tool call it (maybe it is not implemented
yet?)

Yes.  Not implemented yet.


3) There are any reasons why FAR and OFFSET layout scramble data in this
manner, coupling any disk with two more disks? It was done for
simplicity, or I am missing something?

It just seemed the easiest thing to do at the time.


4) you confirm that currently we can _not_ create a FAR layout as the
one depicted by wikipedia by no means? What about OFFSET layout?

You certainly can created the FAR layout depicted on wikipedia, e.g. by
binary-editing the metadata on some devices, or writing some code which does
that for you.  It requires flipping one bit in the metadata and updating the
checksum.  You can probably even to it by writing something appropriate into
some sysfs files.
But mdadm cannot do it yet.
Ditto for the new OFFSET layout.
(The old offset layout can be created with "--layout=o2").

NeilBrown


All clear now :)

Thank you very much Neil.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux