On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Dorau, Lukasz <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:41 AM Neil Brown (neilb@xxxxxxx) wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:10:44 +0000 "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > [...] >> Personally, I really don't care. Does anyone know what udev changed? Maybe >> we should ask udev developers to change it back. >> >> NeilBrown >> > > udev developers wrote: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/udev/udev-builtin-path_id.c#n378 > > /* > * We do not support the ATA transport class, it uses global counters > * to name the ata devices which numbers spread across multiple > * controllers. > * > * The real link numbers are not exported. Also, possible chains of ports > * behind port multipliers cannot be composed that way. > * > * Until all that is solved at the kernel level, there are no by-path/ > * links for ATA devices. > */ > Seems relatively straightforward to add a hardware port number attribute to the ata_port. I think the same could be done ata_link, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
