On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:41 AM Neil Brown (neilb@xxxxxxx) wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:10:44 +0000 "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > [...] > Personally, I really don't care. Does anyone know what udev changed? Maybe > we should ask udev developers to change it back. > > NeilBrown > udev developers wrote: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/udev/udev-builtin-path_id.c#n378 /* * We do not support the ATA transport class, it uses global counters * to name the ata devices which numbers spread across multiple * controllers. * * The real link numbers are not exported. Also, possible chains of ports * behind port multipliers cannot be composed that way. * * Until all that is solved at the kernel level, there are no by-path/ * links for ATA devices. */ Lukasz > > > > The /dev/disk/by-path/* symlinks are not created for ATA devices in systems using > systemd v182+, so mdadm cannot use them in case of policies and udev rules > (mdadm -If --path=...) > > > > What do you think - what should be used instead? The symlinks from /sys/block/* ? > > > > Regards, > > Lukasz > > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
