Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stan Hoeppner" <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Martin" <amartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:53:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Automatically drop caches after mdadm fails a drive out of an array?
> 
> On 2/13/2014 11:25 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Andrew Martin wrote:
> > 
> >> Note that I added a new, replacement drive to the array at 17:09. In
> >> lieu of Marvel SAS cards, what would you recommend?
> > 
> > LSI 2008 is very well tested HBA controller, it exists in many vendors'
> > cards. Works properly with 4TB drives (and larger I presume). For
> > instance the LSI SAS 9211-8i HBA has this chip.
> 
> Agreed, LSI based HBAs are all pretty reliable.  These chips can be
> found on motherboards, LSI branded HBAs, as well as IBM, Intel, and
> other branded HBAs.  The multi-lane Adaptecs are good as well.
> 
> Honestly, I've only really heard of serious problems with the mvsas
> driver and the Marvell SAS 88SE64xx based HBAs, most often the
> Supermicro, but also the Highpoint 2600 family.  There may be others.
> 

Thanks for the help!

Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux