Re: Very long raid5 init/rebuild times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:35:40PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> I'm setting up a new array with 5 4TB drives for which I'll use dmcrypt.
> 
> Question #1:
> Is it better to dmcrypt the 5 drives and then make a raid5 on top, or the opposite
> (raid5 first, and then dmcrypt)
> I used:
> cryptsetup luksFormat --align-payload=8192 -s 256 -c aes-xts-plain64 /dev/sd[mnopq]1
 
I should have said that this is seemingly a stupid question since obviously
if you encrypt each drive separately, you're going through the encryption
layer 5 times during rebuilds instead of just once.
However in my case, I'm not CPU-bound, so that didn't seem to be an issue
and I was more curious to know if the dmcrypt and dmraid5 layers stacked the
same regardless of which one was on top and which one at the bottom.
 
Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux