Re: Best practice for setting up "ordinary" RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Any read
> error or drive failure during the rebuild and you're in trouble.

That was exactly what happened to me ! A rebuild is of course a very
big load and another failure becomes more probable.

> With RAID 6 you can handle 2 drive failures at any time

Understood. I'll definitely switch to RAID 6 :)

> They are more complex, but not enough so to trouble any modern CPU - you
> might have issues on a 386/486, but I doubt you'll see any difference on
> an Atom.

Ok. Maybe I should update French version of Wikipedia RAID article :)
I'll test by myself.
For now (RAID 5), on rebuild, it's about 30MB/s. On reading, it's
about 90MB/s (direct access to /dev/md127, not read from FS).

gUI

-- 
Pour la santé de votre ordinateur, préférez les logiciels libres.
Lire son mail : http://www.mozilla-europe.org/fr/products/thunderbird/
Browser le web : http://www.mozilla-europe.org/fr/products/firefox/
Suite bureautique : http://www.libreoffice.org/download/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux