Re: Triple parity and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:28:37PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
> It's always perilous to follow a Ph.D., so I guess I'm feeling suicidal
> today. ;)
> 
> I'm not attempting to marginalize Andrea's work here, but I can't help
> but ponder what the real value of triple parity RAID is, or quad, or
> beyond.  Some time ago parity RAID's primary mission ceased to be

Hi Stan,

my opinio is that you have to think
in terms of storage devices which are
not always available.
Those are not simply directly connected
HDDs, it could be more exotic.
The example I consider is a p2p network
storage, where the nodes are very little
reliable.
I guess that could be more.

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux