On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > With > any mirror based array one can lose half the disks as long as no two are > in one mirror. The probability of a pair failing together is very low, > and this probability decreases even further as the number of drives in > the array increases. This is one of the many reasons RAID 10 has been > so popular for so many years. Er, no. Sure, the probability of "the failed drive's pair" failing decreases as the number of drives in the array increases IF you assume there will be exactly one failure. But adding more drives increases the probability of another drive failure, and cancels that out. Quite obviously adding more unrelated drives to an array does not affect the probability of failure of the pre-existing drives! (Except perhaps, by over-stressing the PSU and increasing the chances of all the drives failing) -- David Taylor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
