Re: Triple parity and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is also possible to quickly multiply by 2^-1 which makes for an interesting R parity.

Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi David,
>
>>> The choice of ZFS to use powers of 4 was likely not optimal,
>>> because to multiply by 4, it has to do two multiplications by 2.
>> I can agree with that.  I didn't copy ZFS's choice here
>David, it was not my intention to suggest that you copied from ZFS.
>Sorry to have expressed myself badly. I just mentioned ZFS because it's
>an implementation that I know uses powers of 4 to generate triple
>parity, and I saw in the code that it's implemented with two
>multiplication
>by 2.
>
>Ciao,
>Andrea

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux