Linux LVM
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Erwin van Londen <erwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Import duplicate VG from a read-only device
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: hungtask in dm code raised by concurrent run refresh and remove command
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- hungtask in dm code raised by concurrent run refresh and remove command
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --type raid5 failure
- From: Adam Niescierowicz <adam.niescierowicz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- lvconvert --type raid5 failure
- From: Adam Niescierowicz <adam.niescierowicz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2/dm-thin snapshot memory and disk overhead
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvm2/dm-thin snapshot memory and disk overhead
- From: Drew Eckhardt <drew.eckhardt2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help diagnosing lvm ioctl log spam
- From: Fabricio Winter <admin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help diagnosing lvm ioctl log spam
- From: Erwin van Londen <erwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help diagnosing lvm ioctl log spam
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help diagnosing lvm ioctl log spam
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help diagnosing lvm ioctl log spam
- From: Fabricio Winter <admin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Unsubscribe
- From: "box, listen" <listen@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: --autobackup option
- From: Mike <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: --autobackup option
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- --autobackup option
- From: debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Guidance on increasing cache_pool_max_chunks for lvmcache
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Guidance on increasing cache_pool_max_chunks for lvmcache
- From: Pickles Creator <picklesthecreator@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2 deadlock
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvm2 deadlock
- From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Repeated lvcreate&lvremove quickly increases page cache size
- From: Ryotaro Banno (伴野 良太郎) <rbanno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Repeated lvcreate&lvremove quickly increases page cache size
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Repeated lvcreate&lvremove quickly increases page cache size
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Repeated lvcreate&lvremove quickly increases page cache size
- From: Ryotaro Banno (伴野 良太郎) <rbanno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] device mapper udev rules rework
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] device mapper udev rules rework
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/7] 11-dm-lvm.rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/7] 10-dm-rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/7] 10-dm.rules: test DISK_RO after importing properties
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/7] device mapper udev rules rework
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_NOSCAN
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] 11-dm-lvm.rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] 10-dm-rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 6/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 4/7] 11-dm-lvm.rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 3/7] 10-dm-rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/7] device mapper udev rules rework
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: error while submitting device barriers: BTRFS+LVM read-only on newer kernels
- From: Patrick Plenefisch <simonpatp@xxxxxxxxx>
- error while submitting device barriers: BTRFS+LVM read-only on newer kernels
- From: Patrick Plenefisch <simonpatp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 6/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: Don't force activation while device is suspended
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: clear DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG for coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/6] udev rule and CI improvements
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: Don't force activation while device is suspended
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] multipath-tools: Makefile.inc: set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: Don't force activation while device is suspended
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: clear DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG for coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 7/7] multipath-tools: Makefile.inc: set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: Don't force activation while device is suspended
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: clear DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG for coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/7] udev rule and CI improvements
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- About DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG and DM_NOSCAN
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] multipath-tools: Makefile.inc: set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: clear DM_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG for coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] udev rule and CI improvements
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] multipathd: don't activate socket activation by default
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] multipath: udev rules: use configured $(bindir) in udev rules
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: fix list of imported properties
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] multipathd: don't activate socket activation by default
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] multipath: udev rules: use configured $(bindir) in udev rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: handle reloads during coldplug events
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: use import logic like 13-dm-disk.rules
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] multipath-tools: udev rules and service improvements
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: fix list of imported properties
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't import properties that are already set
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Glenn Washburn <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Su Yue <glass.su@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Ilia Zykov <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Question] why not flush device cache at _vg_commit_raw
- From: Su Yue <glass.su@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: lists.linux.dev@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Ilia Zykov <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Ilia Zykov <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- pvmove stuck/hung
- From: Devin Vance <devin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- add volatile flag to PV/LVs (for cache) to avoid degraded state on reboot
- From: lists.linux.dev@xxxxxxxxx
- pvmove stuck/hung
- From: Devin Vance <devin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
- From: François-Xavier Payet <fx@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Unable to resize a logical volume due to wrong reported asked size
- From: François-Xavier Payet <fx@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
- From: Mikhail Morfikov <mmorfikov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
- From: Mikhail Morfikov <mmorfikov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Should issue_discards be enabled when e2scrub is used on an SSD?
- From: Mikhail Morfikov <mmorfikov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- lvm2 2.03.23 git tag
- From: Christian Hesse <list@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvmcache not promoting blocks when there's free RAM
- From: Wolf480pl <wolf480@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgcreate fails with 'already exists in filesystem' error
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- vgcreate fails with 'already exists in filesystem' error
- From: divya mohan <m.divya.mohan@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] man: add inte(g)rity to man lvs
- From: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems on enabling snapshots after reboot,.
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problems on enabling snapshots after reboot,.
- From: Borut Rozman <borut.rozman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-lvm has migrated to lists.linux.dev [was: Re: Welcome to the "linux-lvm" mailing list]
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: grumpy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Is MD array (containing a PV) reducible?
- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to flush dirty cache with dm-cache?
- From: Forza <forza@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Jean-Marc Saffroy <saffroy+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Jean-Marc Saffroy <saffroy+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Jean-Marc Saffroy <saffroy+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Jean-Marc Saffroy <saffroy+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can I combine LUKS and LVM to achieve encryption and snapshots?
- From: Jean-Marc Saffroy <saffroy+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Booting Custom Kernel with QEMU: dracut-initqueue timeout waiting for /dev/sysvg/root
- From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Booting Custom Kernel with QEMU: dracut-initqueue timeout waiting for /dev/sysvg/root
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Booting Custom Kernel with QEMU: dracut-initqueue timeout waiting for /dev/sysvg/root
- From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble Booting Custom Kernel with QEMU: dracut-initqueue timeout waiting for /dev/sysvg/root
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Trouble Booting Custom Kernel with QEMU: dracut-initqueue timeout waiting for /dev/sysvg/root
- From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgchange acquire an exclusive VG lock for refresh
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgchange acquire an exclusive VG lock for refresh
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Roska Postit <roskapostit99999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Roska Postit <roskapostit99999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgchange acquire an exclusive VG lock for refresh
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- vgchange acquire an exclusive VG lock for refresh
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: matthew patton <pattonme@xxxxxxxxx>
- Swapping LLVM drive
- From: Roska Postit <roskapostit99999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- indistinguishable column names ( BA Start Start Start Start )
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: Problems encountered in compiling lvm packages using the musl Toolchain
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problems encountered in compiling lvm packages using the musl Toolchain
- From: 程智星 <zhixing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ThinPool performance problem with NVMe
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ThinPool performance problem with NVMe
- From: ComputerAdvancedTechnologySYSTEM <hofman.catsystem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 答复: The logical volume cannot be activated
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Documentation about allowing >2 disk failures?
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ThinPool performance problem with NVMe
- From: matthew patton <pattonme@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The logical volume cannot be activated
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- The logical volume cannot be activated
- From: "wangzhiqiang (Q)" <wangzhiqiang95@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Documentation about allowing >2 disk failures?
- From: "Tim 'mithro' Ansell" <me@xxxxxxx>
- ThinPool performance problem with NVMe
- From: Anton Kulshenko <shallriseagain@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Scott Moser <smoser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Scott Moser <smoser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Scott Moser <ssmoser@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvm2-testsuite stability
- From: Scott Moser <smoser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on RAID integrity limitations
- From: Cyclic Group Z_1 <cyclicgroup-z1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on RAID integrity limitations
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Question on RAID integrity limitations
- From: Cyclic Group Z_1 <cyclicgroup-z1@xxxxxxxxx>
- intermittent transaction ID mismatch with rapid use of thin snapshots
- From: Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: badblocks
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: badblocks
- From: graeme vetterlein <graeme.lvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: badblocks
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: badblocks
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- badblocks
- From: graeme vetterlein <graeme.lvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: Giorgio Bersano <giorgio.bersano@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is lvmraid 1 thinpool with integrity safe?
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: is lvmraid 1 thinpool with integrity safe?
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- is lvmraid 1 thinpool with integrity safe?
- From: Arvid Picciani <aep@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: matthew patton <pattonme@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to convert a single path to a multipath after using dm-multipath
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- bug? shrink lv by specifying pv extent to be removed does not behave as expected
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: bad checksum in superblock, wanted
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- bad checksum in superblock, wanted
- From: Delarians <alexsifm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM and RO device/partition(s
- From: lacsaP Patatetom <patatetom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM and RO device/partition(s
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM and RO device/partition(s)
- From: lacsaP Patatetom <patatetom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM and RO device/partition(s)
- From: lacsaP Patatetom <patatetom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM and RO device/partition(s)
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- LVM and RO device/partition(s)
- From: Pascal <patatetom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to handle Bad Block relocation with LVM?
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- lvconvert --uncache takes hours
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- pvshrink - defrag pv / move extents to the beginning
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: [External] Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trouble with balancing physical volumes with pvmove
- From: John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx>
- The feasibility of implementing an alternative snapshot approach
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Trouble with balancing physical volumes with pvmove
- From: Robert Osowiecki <robert.osowiecki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvm-vdo, snapshots and cache
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How to implement live migration of VMs in thinlv after using lvmlockd
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvs activation columns are confusing for shared volume groups
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- lvs activation columns are confusing for shared volume groups
- From: corubba <corubba@xxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Erwin van Londen <erwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Pawan Sharma <sharmapawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Kapil Upadhayay <kupadhayay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Mitta Sai Chaithanya <mittas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Pawan Sharma <sharmapawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- LVM2 : performance drop even after deleting the snapshot
- From: Pawan Sharma <sharmapawan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to change default system dir
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to change default system dir
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- LVM2 Metadata structure, extents ordering, metadata corruptions
- From: Roberto Fastec <roberto.fastec@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to change default system dir
- From: Bartłomiej Błachut <bartlomiejblachut@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- lvmpolld causes IO performance issue
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes high cpu load issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmpolld causes IO performance issue
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating/restoring snapshots in early userspace
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating/restoring snapshots in early userspace
- From: cd <cd@terminal.space>
- Re: Creating/restoring snapshots in early userspace
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Ken Bass <daytooner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Creating/restoring snapshots in early userspace
- From: cd <cd@terminal.space>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Ken Bass <daytooner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raidintegrity on non top level LVs
- From: ajs124 <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raidintegrity on non top level LVs
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raidintegrity on non top level LVs
- From: ajs124 <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: "Thomas Deutschmann" <whissi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: "Thomas Deutschmann" <whissi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: "Thomas Deutschmann" <whissi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvcreate hangs forever during snapshot creation when suspending volume
- From: "Thomas Deutschmann" <whissi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Roger James <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Roger James <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the data blocks of an LV?
- From: Roger James <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the data blocks of an LV?
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with partially activate logical volume
- From: Ken Bass <daytooner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fix for Bug 2109351 - multipath_component_detection = 0 in lvm.conf does not have any effect
- From: "Marappan, Gopinath" <Gopinath.Marappan@xxxxxxxx>
- Where are the data blocks of an LV?
- From: Marcin Owsiany <marcin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from a failed pvmove
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from a failed pvmove
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from a failed pvmove
- From: Roger James <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering from a failed pvmove
- From: Roger James <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Abhishek Agarwal <mragarwal.developer@xxxxxxxxx>
- dm-cache / lvmcache - no cleanup for dirty data in writeback/cleaner mode
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Abhishek Agarwal <mragarwal.developer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Abhishek Agarwal <mragarwal.developer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Abhishek Agarwal <mragarwal.developer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: Olaf Seibert <o.seibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: Olaf Seibert <o.seibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: Olaf Seibert <o.seibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- lvm commands hanging when run from inside a kubernetes pod
- From: Abhishek Agarwal <mragarwal.developer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.
- From: Olaf Seibert <o.seibert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: The lvm partiton size is not accurate
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- The lvm partiton size is not accurate
- From: "Yu, Mingli" <Mingli.Yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgcreate doesn't work with lvmlockd running
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Alex Lieflander <atlief@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Alex Lieflander <atlief@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Silence Pool Check Overprovisioning Warnings
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Silence Pool Check Overprovisioning Warnings
- From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: vgcreate doesn't work with lvmlockd running
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- vgcreate doesn't work with lvmlockd running
- From: Zhiyong Ye <yezhiyong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Alex Lieflander <atlief@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Bypassing LVM Restrictions - RAID6 With Less Than 5 Disks
- From: Alex Lieflander <atlief@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] misc: use getrandom(GRND_INSECURE) instead of /dev/urandom when possible
- From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
- Running multiple LVM commands in a batch
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Disable lvm2 udev rules if `dmsetup splitname` fails
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] dmsetup: return non-zero on stdio I/O error
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] Disable udev rules if udev flags can't be obtained
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Disable lvm2 udev rules if `dmsetup splitname` fails
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] dmsetup: return non-zero on stdio I/O error
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] Make udev rules more robust
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Frequent crashes when accessing dev_name(dev) on an empty list
- From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: "heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx" <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: "heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx" <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: "heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx" <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM autoactivation and udev
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM fast mode
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- LVM fast mode
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need inputs: Performance issues with LVM snapshots
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need inputs: Performance issues with LVM snapshots
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Need inputs: Performance issues with LVM snapshots
- From: "Gaikwad, Hemant" <H.Gaikwad@xxxxxxxx>
- LVM limits
- From: Christian Blume <chr.blume@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cannot manage FS of thin volume
- From: Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cannot manage FS of thin volume
- From: Viktor Trojanovic <viktor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need information
- From: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need information
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Need information
- From: Gk Gk <ygk.kmr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Frequent crashes when accessing dev_name(dev) on an empty list
- From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Frequent crashes when accessing dev_name(dev) on an empty list
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Frequent crashes when accessing dev_name(dev) on an empty list
- From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thin pool performance when allocating lots of blocks
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thin pool performance when allocating lots of blocks
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Thin pool performance when allocating lots of blocks
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Thin pool performance when allocating lots of blocks
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: lvmdevices - impossible to remove/cleanup device
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- lvmdevices - impossible to remove/cleanup device
- From: lejeczek <peljasz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Gionatan Danti <g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM RAID behavior after losing physical disk
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- LVM performance vs direct dm-thin
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Running thin_trim before activating a thin pool
- From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM RAID behavior after losing physical disk
- From: Andrei Rodionov <andrei.rodionov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM RAID behavior after losing physical disk
- From: "John Stoffel" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- LVM RAID behavior after losing physical disk
- From: Andrei Rodionov <andrei.rodionov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM pull requests?
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- LVM pull requests?
- From: Wayne Workman <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM: Metadata on ... has wrong VG name
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: convert logical sector -> physical sector + pv/vg extent number
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't get merge in background using blockdev api to work
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't get merge in background using blockdev api to work
- From: Vojtech Trefny <vtrefny@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: convert logical sector -> physical sector + pv/vg extent number
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: convert logical sector -> physical sector + pv/vg extent number
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Can't get merge in background using blockdev api to work
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: convert logical sector -> physical sector + pv/vg extent number
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- convert logical sector -> physical sector + pv/vg extent number
- From: Roland <devzero@xxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM: Metadata on ... has wrong VG name
- From: <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM: Metadata on ... has wrong VG name
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Phillip Susi <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: size of lvm metadata
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- LVM: Metadata on ... has wrong VG name
- From: <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- how to convert a disk containing a snapshot to a snapshot lv?
- From: Tomas Dalebjörk <tomas.dalebjork@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reason to use -r when systemd-run vgchange -aay
- From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reason to use -r when systemd-run vgchange -aay
- From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reason to use -r when systemd-run vgchange -aay
- From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM Thin - bad checksum in superblock - cannot perform operations on metadata
- From: Ming-Hung Tsai <mingnus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (resend) may bug: lvconvert reports "Insufficient free space" when doing "--replace"
- From: "heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx" <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
- LVM Thin - bad checksum in superblock - cannot perform operations on metadata
- From: pavel olenev <pavel.olenev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replace Drive in RAID6
- From: Adam Puleo <adam.puleo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Have tested dm-raid/lv mirroring with block guard on one leg but not the other, it fails to mirror the disk
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "md/raid:mdX: cannot start dirty degraded array."
- From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (resend) may bug: lvconvert reports "Insufficient free space" when doing "--replace"
- From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replace Drive in RAID6
- From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Replace Drive in RAID6
- From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Gluster Users]
[Ceph Users]
[Filesystem Development]
[Kernel Development]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux Clusters]