Re: Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 02. 04. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe?
In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these,
but only for operations performed by qubesd.  systemd-udevd will still
be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices
these commands create or destroy.  systemd-udevd will still be in charge
of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use
neither of these.

This env variable is not meant to be use on system with running udev.

So it's never safe - and it's only purpose is to be able to make some progress in some critical system condition.

Regards

Zdenek

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux