Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe?
In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these,
but only for operations performed by qubesd.  systemd-udevd will still
be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices
these commands create or destroy.  systemd-udevd will still be in charge
of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use
neither of these.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Invisible Things Lab

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux