On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 16:26 +0800, heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > Your concern is may right, "vgchange --monirtor y" will call > lvmcache_label_scan() to search > active VGs , meanwhile libudev hasn't done on some devs. And then > vgchange will output > some warning which can be ignored but may irritate users. Again, I'm not so much concerned about the warning. More about what happens if "vgchange --monitor y" ignores information from udev. > In theory, if "vgchange --monitor y" only handles the VGs which > created during initrd phase > can avoid this problem. Yes, but that's not how it currently behaves, right? Martin _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
