Re: raid10 with missing redundancy, but health status claims it is ok.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30.05.22 16:07, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Can you try to live-migrate the VMs off of this node?  If not, can you
> announce a maintenance window and power off the VMs so you can take a
> block-level backup?

Alas, this (type of) compute node is designed specifically to use local
storage instead of (shared) network storage. This prevents live migration.
If live migration were possible (and it would include migrating the
disk storage), then this would more or less automatically solve
the problem: on the new node the LV would be a fresh one
and thus nicely mirrored.

Maybe somebody could add support for something like that to OpenStack,
but right now it can't do it.

Cheers,
-Olaf.

-- 
SysEleven GmbH
Boxhagener Straße 80
10245 Berlin

T +49 30 233 2012 0
F +49 30 616 7555 0

http://www.syseleven.de
http://www.facebook.com/SysEleven
https://www.instagram.com/syseleven/

Aktueller System-Status immer unter:
http://www.twitter.com/syseleven

Firmensitz: Berlin
Registergericht: AG Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 108571 B
Geschäftsführer: Marc Korthaus, Jens Ihlenfeld, Andreas Hermann

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux