Dne 15. 11. 22 v 23:41 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2022-11-15 22:56 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
You could try 'vg' on top of another 'vg' - however I'd not recommend
to use it this way (and it's unssuported (&unsupportable) by lvm2 in
general)
Hi Zdenek,
yeah, I would strongly avoid that outside lab testing.
IMHO I'd not recommend to combine 2 provisioning technologies - it's
already hard to resolve 'out-of-space' troubles with just one
technology...
The issue is that fast snapshots are only provided by dm-thin, meaning that
lvmthin is almost mandatory for implementing a rolling/continuous snapshot
scheme. And, on a more basic level, if we can not stack LVM on top of a VDO LV
(in a supported manner), how can we take a snapshot of user data residing on
that specific volume?
Well - as said - vg on vg is basically equivalent of the original LV on top of
VDO manager.
But still these fast snapshot do not solve you a problem of double
out-of-space fault.
This seems a clear regression vs a separate VDO device. Am I missing something?
It's good for experimenting - but I'd not suggest to use this setup.
Regards
Zdenek
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/