Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- sync action not working/ignored
- From: Alexander Kühn <alexander.kuehn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?
- From: "mirovis" <mirovis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] raid5: Correct some failed-stripe which because the badsector.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] raid5: Fix to_read/to_write judgement.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] raid5: fix possible oops in add_stripe_bio when enable pr_debug
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] raid5: Add per-stripe lock on toread in func
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] raid5: fix three bugs.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Shouldn't --zero-superblock reset the UUID?
- From: "mirovis" <mirovis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: hung in raise_barrier() in raid1.c -- any ideas?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: hung in raise_barrier() in raid1.c -- any ideas?
- From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: hung in raise_barrier() in raid1.c -- any ideas?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: hung in raise_barrier() in raid1.c -- any ideas?
- From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small short question Was: Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small short question Was: Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- hung in raise_barrier() in raid1.c -- any ideas?
- From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID array on block device vs. on partition
- From: "Andrew Dedesko" <adedesko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: Markus Irle <tha.bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH] raid5: fix possible oops in add_stripe_bio when enable pr_debug
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Areca hardware RAID / first-ever SCSI bus reset: am I about to lose this disk controller?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: fix possible oops in add_stripe_bio when enable pr_debug
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: fix possible oops in add_stripe_bio when enable pr_debug
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH] md: Add two chances to update sync/recovery checkpoint
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md: Add two chances to update sync/recovery checkpoint
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/bitmap:Don't use IS_ERR to judge alloc_page().
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: imsm: re-enable size expansion to the max value
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: adjust parse_size() to the unsigned size variable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: imsm: do not accept too small sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small short question Was: Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix: imsm: mdmon should reread component_size on wakeup
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix segfaults in Detail()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <kontakt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/md/raid1.c: fix NULL pointer bug in fix_read_error function
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Areca hardware RAID / first-ever SCSI bus reset: am I about to lose this disk controller?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Areca hardware RAID / first-ever SCSI bus reset: am I about to lose this disk controller?
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Areca hardware RAID / first-ever SCSI bus reset: am I about to lose this disk controller?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: Markus Irle <tha.bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: Ferry <iscsitmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: freaky <freaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: freaky <freaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- GPT Table broken on a Raid1
- From: Günther J. Niederwimmer <gjn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't reshape RAID1 to RAID5 due to chunk size
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: Arne Redlich <arne.redlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't reshape RAID1 to RAID5 due to chunk size
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] 3 fixes for md in 3.6.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Stop IMSM verify?
- From: Daniel Frey <djqfrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD device always starting as /dev/md127
- From: Bryan Bush <bbushvt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD device always starting as /dev/md127
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD device always starting as /dev/md127
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MD device always starting as /dev/md127
- From: Bryan Bush <bbushvt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Serious performance issues with mdadm RAID-5 partition exported through LIO (iSCSI)
- From: Ferry <iscsitmp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: GuoZhong Han <hanguozhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/2]MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/2]MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What parameters to mdadm, to re-create md device with payload starting at 0x22000 position on backing storage?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What parameters to mdadm, to re-create md device with payload starting at 0x22000 position on backing storage?
- From: Adam Ryczkowski <adam.ryczkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stop IMSM verify?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong count of devices in /proc/mdstat after "want_replacement"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Wrong count of devices in /proc/mdstat after "want_replacement"
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: What parameters to mdadm, to re-create md device with payload starting at 0x22000 position on backing storage?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: imsm: mdmon should reread component_size on wakeup
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- What parameters to mdadm, to re-create md device with payload starting at 0x22000 position on backing storage?
- From: Adam Ryczkowski <adam.ryczkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: "Johnson Yan" <johnson_yan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: "Johnson Yan" <johnson_yan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 3.6-rc5 cgroups blkio throttle + md regression
- From: Joseph Glanville <joseph.glanville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm kernel log messages explained
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm kernel log messages explained
- From: Adam Ryczkowski <adam.ryczkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm kernel log messages explained
- From: Adam Ryczkowski <adam.ryczkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: Markus Irle <tha.bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: Add two chances to update sync/recovery checkpoint
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/bitmap:Don't use IS_ERR to judge alloc_page().
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: Avoid doing more read on dev of a stripe at the same time
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small short question
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small short question
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- [PATCH] fix: imsm: do not accept too small sizes
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: adjust parse_size() to the unsigned size variable
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix: imsm: re-enable size expansion to the max value
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Small short question Was: Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID0 DeviceDisappeared event happen when restart mdmonitor service
- From: "Johnson Yan" <johnson_yan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5:bad sectors after lost power
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5:bad sectors after lost power
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active
- From: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] fix segfaults in Detail()
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5:bad sectors after lost power
- From: Mathias Buren <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid5:bad sectors after lost power
- From: "vincent" <hanguozhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/md/raid1.c: fix NULL pointer bug in fix_read_error function
- From: hank <pyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/md/raid1.c: fix NULL pointer bug in fix_read_error function
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Mathias Buren <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: GuoZhong Han <hanguozhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/md/raid1.c: fix NULL pointer bug in fix_read_error function
- From: hank <pyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stop IMSM verify?
- From: Daniel Frey <djqfrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stop IMSM verify?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm forces resync every boot
- From: Daniel Frey <djqfrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Stop IMSM verify?
- From: Daniel Frey <djqfrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How can I ensure that my swraid saves checkpoints with sysrq reboot?
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How can I ensure that my swraid saves checkpoints with sysrq reboot?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- How can I ensure that my swraid saves checkpoints with sysrq reboot?
- From: Marc MERLIN <marc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- R: Data recovery after the failure of two disks of 4
- From: Carabetta Giulio <g.carabetta@xxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB
- From: "vincent" <hanguozhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Can't reshape RAID1 to RAID5 due to chunk size
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 low performance 8x3tb drives in singledegraded mode(=7x3tb)
- From: Kasper Sandberg <kontakt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- md: raid5 resync corrects read errors on data block - is this correct?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Data recovery after the failure of two disks of 4
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: status of patches ( raid5 multiple threads )
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: question about bitmap for raid6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- status of patches ( raid5 multiple threads )
- From: vincent Ferrer <vincentchicago1@xxxxxxxxx>
- FW: question about bitmap for raid6
- From: Ming Lei <Ming.Lei@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Ralf Müller <ralf@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix and extend raid6check repair
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from the kernel bug, Neil?
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Wrong array size detected after reboot
- From: Markus Irle <tha.bear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Ralf Müller <ralf@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dm mpath: move the dereference below the NULL test
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with md and 4K sector alignment
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Howto avoid full re-sync
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Content Of Files May Be Changed After One Disk Is Failed In RAID5
- From: clplayer <cl.player@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with md and 4K sector alignment
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix segfaults in Detail()
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: John Drescher <drescherjm@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dm-bufio: use list_move instead of list_del/list_add
- From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] raid5:Move comment to func handle_stripe.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] raid5: If stripe was on delay state,it don't judge other disks state.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] raid5: remove unnecessary parameter.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3][trivial] Fix some trivial bugs
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: John Drescher <drescherjm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: John Drescher <drescherjm@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] MD RAID10: Prep for DM RAID10 device replacement capability
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: John Drescher <drescherjm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Data recovery after the failure of two disks of 4
- From: Carabetta Giulio <g.carabetta@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] MD RAID10: Prep for DM RAID10 device replacement capability
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems after extending partition [SOLVED]
- From: Ross Boylan <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@xxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: use TRIM data from filesystems to speed up array rebuild?
- From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Safe disk replace
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Safe disk replace
- From: Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/md/raid1.c: fix NULL pointer bug in fix_read_error function
- From: hank <pyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm.conf on Ubuntu - it's alive!
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: mdadm.conf on Ubuntu - it's alive!
- From: Gilbert Standen <gstanden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] debian: symlink mdmon pidfile into /run/sendsigs.omit.d
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems after extending partition
- From: Ross Boylan <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems after extending partition
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problems after extending partition
- From: Ross Boylan <ross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH] Immutable bio vecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm: Assemble.c: "force-one" update conflicts with the split-brain protection logic
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- md raid with lvm lv member
- From: Markus Falb <markus.falb@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3 of 3] DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2 of 3] DM RAID: Move 'rebuild' checking code to its own function
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1 of 3] MD RAID10: Prep for DM RAID10 device replacement capability
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] debian: symlink mdmon pidfile into /run/sendsigs.omit.d
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] debian: symlink mdmon pidfile into /run/sendsigs.omit.d
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] debian: symlink mdmon pidfile into /run/sendsigs.omit.d
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] debian: symlink mdmon pidfile into /run/sendsigs.omit.d
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Confusion about chunk/stripe size mdadm in combination with LVM stripe size
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Lose two disks during Raid 10 rebuild
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] DM RAID: Fix for ineffective "sync" directive
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Confusion about chunk/stripe size mdadm in combination with LVM stripe size
- From: Caspar Smit <c.smit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx>
- mdadm: Assemble.c: "force-one" update conflicts with the split-brain protection logic
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid6 not working
- From: "Vanhorn, Mike" <michael.vanhorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: remove unnecessary "set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE,&sh->state)" in func handle_stripe_dirtying.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid6 not working
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx>
- Re: Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: Michael-John Turner <mj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: md raid6 not working
- From: "Vanhorn, Mike" <michael.vanhorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: Tim Small <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: Tim Small <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid6 not working
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Controller problems during reshape -> can't continue reshape after reboot.
- From: Tim Small <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid6 not working
- From: "Vanhorn, Mike" <michael.vanhorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Using SCSI timeouts in place of ERC
- From: joystick <joystick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm -add doesn't start rebuilding array
- From: Sergiusz Brzeziński <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with md and 4K sector alignment
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Issue with md and 4K sector alignment
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Richard Scobie <r.scobie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Issue with md and 4K sector alignment
- From: Kyle Brantley <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering from the kernel bug
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- md raid behavior, bad sector uncorrectable read error
- From: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Few questions about TRIM/discard
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Inexpensive RAID1 controller for home server?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Still problems with ddf stuff
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: When add stripe_head to inactive_list, it should remove hash.
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md: 2 patches, both heading for -stable
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdraid6 problem post 3.5.0
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Array rebuilding over and over
- From: "Singer, Benedict" <bzsing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array rebuilding over and over
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Array rebuilding over and over
- From: "Singer, Benedict" <bzsing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] raid, kmemleak, netfilter: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
- From: Michael Wang <wangyun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Backup file size when migrating from raid5 to raid6?
- From: Thomas Fjellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: vincent Ferrer <vincentchicago1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: vincent Ferrer <vincentchicago1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Flynn <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- re: md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 to utilize upto 8 cores
- From: vincent Ferrer <vincentchicago1@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update address for Dan Williams
- From: Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in rebuild of two "layered" md devices in container
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Sam Clark <sclark_77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND] Fix and extend raid6check repair
- From: Robert Buchholz <robert.buchholz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: John Robinson <john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid10 Oops on recent kernels
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: kedacomkernel <kedacomkernel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- O_DIRECT to md raid 6 is slow
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in rebuild of two "layered" md devices in container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf failed disk disappears after adding spare
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid10 Oops on recent kernels
- From: Ivan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Sam Clark <sclark_77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v2]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] query udev dir via pkg-config
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md raid10 Oops on recent kernels
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Manage.c: fix make everything compilation error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Add WWN in superblock
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sha1.h: remove ansidecl.h header inclusion
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] md/linear: rcu_dereference outside read-lock section
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] query udev dir via pkg-config
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/linear: rcu_dereference outside read-lock section
- From: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] query udev dir via pkg-config
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Experience of LSI MegaRAID 9260CV?
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- md raid10 Oops on recent kernels
- From: Ivan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sha1.h: remove ansidecl.h header inclusion
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: Add WWN in superblock
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Manage.c: fix make everything compilation error
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Experience of LSI MegaRAID 9260CV?
- From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: Jake Thomas <thomasj10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: Jake Thomas <thomasj10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: Jake Thomas <thomasj10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk Order
- From: pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Device Unusable At Startup
- From: Jake Thomas <thomasj10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] mdassemble: split dietlibc logic into dedicated target
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix handling of CPPFLAGS
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Grow.c: change size to be unsigned and use '0' in case of 'no change'
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Disk Order
- From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] mdassemble: split dietlibc logic into dedicated target
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] fix handling of CPPFLAGS
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Solved! (was Re: RAID6 Reshape (one more time))
- From: Flynn <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Sam Clark <sclark_77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page.
- From: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: What does the '-1' value of size mean now?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Grow.c: change size to be unsigned and use '0' in case of 'no change'
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 7/7 v2] MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 5/7 v2] md: raid 10 supports TRIM
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 4/7 v2] md: raid 1 supports TRIM
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/7 v2] md: raid 0 supports TRIM
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/7 v2] md: linear supports TRIM
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/7 v2] block: makes bio_split support bio without data
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: replaced disk in RAID1 imsm array - how to activate?
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- What does the '-1' value of size mean now?
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: replaced disk in RAID1 imsm array - how to activate?
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: replaced disk in RAID1 imsi array - how to activate?
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- replaced disk in RAID1 imsi array - how to activate?
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/2 v3]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/2 V3]MD: change the parameter of md thread
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID5 - Disk failed during re-shape
- From: Sam Clark <sclark_77@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What happened to TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10?
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 Reshape (one more time)
- From: Flynn <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What happened to TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- What happened to TRIM support for raid linear/0/1/10?
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch]raid5: fix directio regression
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md/raid5: Fix two small bugs in init_stripe().
- From: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Device Unusable At Startup
- From: Jake Thomas <thomasj10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- swapping a single drive with a RAID-1 array. At array boot, "No Boot Device found". What've I missed?
- From: pgn14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How does one assemble a DDF or IMSM array?
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: Flynn <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does one assemble a DDF or IMSM array?
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID6 Reshape Gone Awry
- From: Flynn <flynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- SparesMissing event
- From: Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How does one assemble a DDF or IMSM array?
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 V1] [PATCH] fs/block-dev.c:fix performance regression in O_DIRECT writes to md block devices
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V1] [PATCH] fs/block-dev.c:fix performance regression in O_DIRECT writes to md block devices
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] few more md patches now that dependencies are present.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in rebuild of two "layered" md devices in container
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Error in rebuild of two "layered" md devices in container
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf failed disk disappears after adding spare
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf failed disk disappears after adding spare
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: Skip Coombe <skipcoombe@xxxxxxxxx>
- OT: silent data corruption reading from hard drives
- From: matt <listy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL REQUEST] md update for 3.6
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md update for 3.6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- ddf failed disk disappears after adding spare
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: linbloke <linbloke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2]raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5] DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How does one assemble a DDF or IMSM array?
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: Skip Coombe <skipcoombe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] udev-rules: prevent systemd from mount devices before they are ready.
- Re: Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair: sync_request() aborts if one of the drives has bad block recorded
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair: sync_request() aborts if one of the drives has bad block recorded
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: Adam Goryachev <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Set bi_rw when alloc bio before call bio_add_page.
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- persistent removed MD referrence on reboot
- From: Skip Coombe <skipcoombe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Set bi_rw when alloc bio.
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem hot-adding spare / internal bitmap problem?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Set bi_rw when alloc bio.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem hot-adding spare / internal bitmap problem?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem hot-adding spare / internal bitmap problem?
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- problem hot-adding spare / internal bitmap problem?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Version 3.2.5 and ddf issues (bugreport)
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Set bi_rw when alloc bio.
- From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Set bi_rw when alloc bio.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID10 Performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID10 Performance
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 2/2]raid1: use discard if sync data is 0
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 1/2]raid1: only write mismatch sectors in sync
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] blk: pass from_schedule to non-request unplug functions.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] block: stack unplug
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] blk: centralize non-request unplug handling.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] Plugging changes for blk/md/umem
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Kevin Ross <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID extremely slow
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does mdadm require udev/sysfs to create imsm RAID1?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Does mdadm require udev/sysfs to create imsm RAID1?
- From: Scott Johnson <scottej23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 repair: sync_request() aborts if one of the drives has bad block recorded
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smarter md minor search than "find_free_devnum" needed
- From: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need to remove failed disk from RAID5 array
- From: Alex <mysqlstudent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem recovering failed Intel Rapid Storage raid5 volume
- From: Khurram Hassan <kfhassan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
- From: Brassow Jonathan <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem recovering failed Intel Rapid Storage raid5 volume
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4] DM RAID: Add support for MD RAID10
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem recovering failed Intel Rapid Storage raid5 volume
- From: Khurram Hassan <kfhassan@xxxxxxxxx>
- smarter md minor search than "find_free_devnum" needed
- From: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- vulnerability during partition-size-growth procedures
- From: Brendan Hide <brendan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need to remove failed disk from RAID5 array
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about how to migrate raid0 to raid5
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 array tend to two degraded raid10 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem recovering failed Intel Rapid Storage raid5 volume
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: "A Nasty md/raid bug"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Find mismatch in data blocks during raid6 repair
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Problem recovering failed Intel Rapid Storage raid5 volume
- From: Khurram Hassan <kfhassan@xxxxxxxxx>
- "A Nasty md/raid bug"
- From: "Peter Modrala" <x3m2@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]