On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:16:20 +0200 (CEST) Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > "check" records errors, no action is taken by the md driver to correct > > it, although the disk firmware itself may try reallocation. So far, that > > appears to not be the case. > > > > "repair" causes the md driver to write correct data (from copy or > > reconstructed from parity), which should force the disk firmware to > > reallocate the affected LBAs from bad physical sectors to good ones. > > > > It seems in this case "repair" is indicated. > > I was under the impression that "check" would check if all data blocks and > parity are correct, and record if there is a parity mismatch. This would > then be corrected by using "repair" at a later time. > > I was also under the impression that if there was a read error on a drive > during "check", that read error would be corrected using parity because > it's obviously a hard error, not a logical error. Both of your impressions are correct. NeilBrown > > Could you (or someone else) please confirm that my impression is wrong and > if there indeed is a hard read error using "check", this will not be > corrected? I would be interested in knowing why this decision was taken to > have this behaviour, as I feel that if there is a hard read error, this > should always be corrected using parity. >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature