Hello Chris, Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2012, 11:34:12 schrieb Chris Murphy: > On Sep 20, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > > this is "normal" I install "windows 7" first ;). but the problem with the > > wrong GPT Table Message I have also on a Raid10 with "Intel Matrix > > Storage" > > and dmraid installation. > > OK you didn't answer my question about what mdadm metadata version your md > RAID is using. If it's 1.0 instead of 1.2 that could be the culprit. > > The Question is, work parted correct with Raid GPT Table? Thank you for the answer. excuse ;). OK. I have mdadm-3.2.5-3.7.1 parted 2.4.-24.2.2 on the computer. > Could be a bug in parted 2.3, which is old. Try using parted 3.0. I will search ;) > Another question is, do you really think it's a good idea to be mixing > different RAID implementations on the same physical devices, which also > appear to contain boot volumes? My installing is, win7 on the Raid1 GPT EFI the Raid1 have Partitions, 5 for NTFS and one ext4 for the "/Home" Direktory My Linux is on a SSD, SSD is also GPT EFI formated. > > I think one of your RAID implementations is stepping on the GPT secondary > header. I've seen this before in a BIOS "fakeraid" implementation. So I > would look at all of your RAID implementations, make sure they're using the > latest versions. Yes, it is a Intel Matrix Storage System, the Board is a DX58SO2 with last Bios & Firmware for the "fakeraid" ;) my question is, win can work with no Problem on the "Fakeraid" and a GPT Table. Could it be, that the kernel or / and parted have a Problem with the GPT Table on a Raid1 or a Raid10 Fakeraid ? I have this Problem on all my three Systems (Intel), also on my Small 19" Intel Server. -- mit freundlichen Grüßen / best Regards. Günther J. Niederwimmer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
