Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/08/2012 12:41, Sergiusz Brzeziński wrote:
Hi,

I use Raid1 to make backup of the whole system.

Raid is not a backup system. It is to improve uptimes, minimise downtimes due to disk failures, and possibly to improve disk speed and/or capacity.

I would recommend you first think about what you are trying to achieve here - what are you trying to back up, how do you see restores being used, how efficiently are you using your hardware, your bandwidth, your time and effort?

You would probably be better off with a normal fixed 2-disk raid1 to minimise the problems caused by a single disk failure, combined with an rsync snapshot style backup that can be fully automated and give quick and easy recovery of multiple old versions of files in the face of the most common cause of data loss - human error.

I remove hot-swap one
drive from the array, and insert another drive. The goal is, that the
only activity of a man is remove and insert the drive. The rest has to
be automated.

Every drive, I use for this, has prepared Raid partition and was once
added to array, so the zero block exists and UUID is equal to the
working array.

After changing drives, the rebuilding must be initialized (mdadm -add)

But first, it must be discovered, that the device with consistent UUID
appeared in the system with degraded array and is available for us.
After such discover, I can add the device to the degraded array and
start rebuilding.

"mdadm --monitor" can recognize that a drive disappeared, but it can't
recognize, thant a drive with consistent UUID appeared!

Or maybye I am wrong and I didn't understand something from mdadm and
mdadm.conf?

Now I use for this my own script in crontab and i don't use "mdadm
--monitor" at all because it only partially do what I want.

My question is: Is it possibe to recognize with "mdadm --monitor" that
the new device with consistent UUID appeared? Or if no, do You mean,
this feature is worth to implement?

Sergiusz

ps.

sorry for my english :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux