Re: [PATCH 1/3] Align FAILED to test name to be parsable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Mail original -----
> De: "NeilBrown" <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> À: "Gilles Espinasse" <g.esp@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Envoyé: Lundi 22 Octobre 2012 00:08:55
> Objet: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Align FAILED to test name to be parsable
> 
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:03:22 +0200 Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > So 'grep FAILED log' is now meaningfull.
> > Let both stdout and sderr be displayed after a failed test
> > ---
> >  test |    5 +++--
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test b/test
> > index 9340afe..2bb482c 100755
> > --- a/test
> > +++ b/test
> > @@ -222,12 +222,13 @@ do_test() {
> >      # source script in a subshell, so it has access to our
> >      # namespace, but cannot change it.
> >      echo -ne "$_script... "
> > -    if ( set -ex ; . $_script )  2> $targetdir/log
> > +    if ( set -ex ; . $_script ) &> $targetdir/log
> >      then
> >        echo "succeeded"
> >        _fail=0
> >      else
> > -      echo "FAILED - see $targetdir/log for details"
> > +      echo "FAILED"
> > +      cat $targetdir/log
> >        _fail=1
> >      fi
> >      if [ "$savelogs" == "1" ]; then
> 
> Hi,
>  the patch makes some sense, but it doesn't seem to match the
>  description,
>  though maybe I'm just being dense.
> 
>  How does the patch "Align FAILED to test name" ?
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> 
I have a test that failed with
tests/06r5swap... --- /var/tmp/d1	2012-10-20 08:36:12.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/d1s	2012-10-20 08:36:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-/dev/loop1:
-          Magic : a92b4efc
-        Version : 0.90.00
-           UUID : 3a6a4fbd:b6c09cce:37479202:ddc39261 (local to host a7n8x-e)
-  Creation Time : Sat Oct 20 08:36:07 2012
-     Raid Level : raid5
-  Used Dev Size : 19456 (19.00 MiB 19.92 MB)
-     Array Size : 58368 (57.01 MiB 59.77 MB)
-   Raid Devices : 4
-  Total Devices : 4
-Preferred Minor : 0
-
-    Update Time : Sat Oct 20 08:36:11 2012
-          State : clean
- Active Devices : 3
-Working Devices : 4
- Failed Devices : 1
-  Spare Devices : 1
-       Checksum : 506e39b6 - correct
-         Events : 9
-
-         Layout : left-symmetric
-     Chunk Size : 512K
-
-      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
-this     1       7        8        1      active sync   /dev/loop1
-
-   0     0       7        0        0      active sync   /dev/loop0
-   1     1       7        8        1      active sync   /dev/loop1
-   2     2       7       16        2      active sync   /dev/loop2
-   3     3       0        0        3      faulty removed
-   4     4       7       24        4      spare   /dev/loop3
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
unused devices: <none>
FAILED - see /var/tmp/log for details

When standard output is redirected like in the patch, diff output goes to $targetdir/log and FAILED would be printed one the same line as the test name.

I hadn't yet reported that failure as I am only recently trying to run mdadm test suite and I had some issues to solve before on my build chroot scripts. I suppose there is less value to run that test suite if the running kernel is not from the same version as the 
Once using the same kernel (3.4.14), first failure is the one above.

Gilles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux