On Tue Sep 18, 2012 at 08:53:25AM +0200, Adam Ryczkowski wrote:
> On 2012-09-17 19:49, Robin Hill wrote:
>
> > Your data offset is 272 sectors, which means you'll need to use an older
> > mdadm version to re-create the array. Newer versions use 2048 sectors,
> > but it looks like version 3.0 uses 272, so grab a copy of that if
> > possible.
> Does it mean, that with the current raid setup I need to stick to the
> mdadm 3.0, or is there way to convert the arrays to the new layout so I
> can use a recent mdadm? Re-creating the arrays from scratch would be a
> very long and complex enterprise.
>
You only need 3.0 to do the create. Once that's done, you can use any
newer version.
The only way I know of to update the offset location in an existing
array would be to fail the disks one at a time, zeroing the superblocks,
then adding them back into the array using a new mdadm. When it's added
back in, it'll use the new offset location. If you have a spare disk and
a new enough kernel version, you can use the pre-emptive replacement
option, which will prevent the need to run without full parity
available.
Cheers,
Robin
--
___
( ' } | Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
/ / ) | Little Jim says .... |
// !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
Attachment:
pgpF3MTODf6dB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
