Re: make filesystem failed while the capacity of raid5 is big than 16TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/09/2012 08:30, David Brown wrote:
[...]
  Using 2 x 8-disk raid6 connected by
raid0 (or linear concat for XFS) will be faster and safer than a single
large raid5/6 array, but unless you use the latest multithreaded raid
kernel then it will still be very slow.

Not as far as I understand it, it won't. The multithreaded code is only really a benefit on SSDs which can manage tens of thousands of IOPS, while on spinning rust HDDs which can only manage hundreds of IOPS, the single-threaded code is fine.

Cheers,

John.

--
John Robinson, yuiop IT services
0131 557 9577 / 07771 784 058
46/12 Broughton Road, Edinburgh EH7 4EE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux