Re: raid1 issue after disk failure: both disks of the array are still active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 16, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Niccolò Belli wrote:
> 
> then I read this on the smartmontools mailing list:
> 
> <<
> Possibly what is happening is that because he is only writing a partial
> block, the OS is first trying to read the the original block so that it
> can preserve the parts that won't be changing. When this operation fails,
> it blocks the write that would trigger reallocation of the bad sector.
> Writing using the OS blocksize (typically 4096 on linux systems) properly
> aligned should work around that issue.
> >>
> 
> so I tried with
> 
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4096
> 
> and ta-daaa!

Useful info. Obviously Secure Erasing a disk takes a while and is overkill for just one sector. But I'm still curious if anyone knows if for sure ATA Secure Erase will remove bad sectors from use.

Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux