GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: L4Ka. Regression with 4.7 and 4.8 ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Function Parameters vs. Prologue (fastcall + O1 + -fschedule-insns2)
  • From: Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lvalue required as increment operand
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• L4Ka. Regression with 4.7 and 4.8 ?
  • From: BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lvalue required as increment operand
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trouble building AR
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: if-conversion passes
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Trouble building AR
  • From: Uri Moszkowicz <uri@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: if-conversion passes
  • From: Abdul Wahid Memon <engrwahidmemon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wold-style-casts and system headers
  • From: Anthony Foiani <tkil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wold-style-casts and system headers
  • From: Anthony Foiani <tkil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: -Wold-style-casts and system headers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -femit-struct-debug-reduced/baseonly debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• -Wold-style-casts and system headers
  • From: Anthony Foiani <tkil@xxxxxxxxx>
• if-conversion passes
  • From: Abdul Wahid Memon <engrwahidmemon@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: -femit-struct-debug-reduced/baseonly debug info
  • From: Evgeny Gavrin <evgeny.gavrin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Function Parameters vs. Prologue (fastcall + O1 + -fschedule-insns2)
  • From: Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: gds <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -femit-struct-debug-reduced/baseonly debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: static library unresolved symbols
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• -femit-struct-debug-reduced/baseonly debug info
  • From: Evgeny Gavrin <evgeny.gavrin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• static library unresolved symbols
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Authoritative answer wanted: "-g -O1" vs. "-O1"
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: designated initializers extension and sparc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• designated initializers extension and sparc
  • From: Sergey Kljopov <hlodvig@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Ignas <ignas2526@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Ignas <ignas2526@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Ignas <ignas2526@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Ignas <ignas2526@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc Cortex M4 bug ?
  • From: Ilija Kocho <ilijak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ refuses to compile simple, looking good code
  • From: Luchezar Belev <lukcho@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ refuses to compile simple, looking good code
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ refuses to compile simple, looking good code
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ refuses to compile simple, looking good code
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8.1 building fails
  • From: Ignas <ignas2526@xxxxxxxxx>
• G++ refuses to compile simple, looking good code
  • From: Luchezar Belev <lukcho@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re:Re: gcc Cortex M4 bug ?
  • From: matti h <matti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: g++: duplicate section has different size (only with -march=pentium4, mingw32)
  • From: Frédéric Bron <frederic.bron@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc Cortex M4 bug ?
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does gcc hoist memory-reference based loop invariant?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does gcc hoist memory-reference based loop invariant?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does gcc hoist memory-reference based loop invariant?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Does gcc hoist memory-reference based loop invariant?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc Cortex M4 bug ?
  • From: matti h <matti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble building 4.7.2 w/binutils 2.23.1
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble building 4.7.2 w/binutils 2.23.1
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Basic Block info in DWARF line number table
  • From: Yuë Liu <opuspace@xxxxxxxxx>
• trouble building 4.7.2 w/binutils 2.23.1
  • From: Uri Moszkowicz <uri@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dynamic_cast from a const class
  • From: Andrey Belevantsev <abel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Uri Moszkowicz <uri@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dynamic_cast from a const class
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Uri Moszkowicz <uri@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -flto making program slower?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• -flto making program slower?
  • From: Uri Moszkowicz <uri@xxxxxxxxx>
• link issue for libc stubs
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dynamic_cast from a const class
  • From: david.hagood@xxxxxxxxx
• dynamic_cast from a const class
  • From: Andrey Belevantsev <abel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Thumb inline assembly
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• trouble using glob and wordexp
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU "cpp -P" portability
  • From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: embedding compile options in program
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• embedding compile options in program
  • From: Ilya Shlyakhter <ilya_shl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GNU "cpp -P" portability
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• GNU "cpp -P" portability
  • From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2. build fails
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.2. build fails
  • From: sudha sarita jha <sudha464@xxxxxxxxx>
• Inserting named labels through a GCC plugin
  • From: Yuë Liu <opuspace@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling external programs for SPIM Target results in an infinite loop afer executing cc1.
  • From: Aniket Deole <aniket.deole@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2. build fails
  • From: Aniket Deole <aniket.deole@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.2. build fails
  • From: sudha sarita jha <sudha464@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Performance regression between 4.7.2 and 4.8.1 for shootout's nbody.c
  • From: Walter Landry <wlandry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Performance regression between 4.7.2 and 4.8.1 for shootout's nbody.c
  • From: Walter Landry <wlandry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about __builtin_ia32_mfence and memory barriers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.1 build failure
  • From: prodigyaj <prodigyaj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling external programs for SPIM Target results in an infinite loop afer executing cc1.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• C11 and <stdatomic.h>
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling external programs for SPIM Target results in an infinite loop afer executing cc1.
  • From: Aniket Deole <aniket.deole@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8.0 Build Failed.
  • From: rahul <rahulroot@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 crtbegin.o eh_frame cannot be merged on Solaris 10 x86
  • From: "Bannister, Mark" <Mark.Bannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Analysis and Pointers vs Indexed Arrays?
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::async should work with 4.7.1, but it doesn't?
  • From: Oliver Kullmann <O.Kullmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::async should work with 4.7.1, but it doesn't?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• std::async should work with 4.7.1, but it doesn't?
  • From: Oliver Kullmann <O.Kullmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Position independent code and symbol table providing shared library in bare metal app
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-help Library cleaner Book sterilizer for distributor looking for
  • From: "library" <lcdaccessory@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: "Kifa" <kifathegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Accessing file-scope variable from shared library ctor
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not find shrink_to_fit()
  • From: Sudakshina Das <sudakshina1990@xxxxxxxxx>
• Monster Announcement for Next Week
  • From: icklaying379@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: gcc branch and revision selection
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not find shrink_to_fit()
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Can not find shrink_to_fit()
  • From: Sudakshina Das <sudakshina1990@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc branch and revision selection
  • From: Riccardo Manfrin <riccardomanfrin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8 can't find <bits/c++config.h>
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
  • From: gcc frickler <gccfrickler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
  • From: lluvia_lists@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• -march=native between different X86_64 families
  • From: lluvia_lists@xxxxxxxxxxx
• MAX_PATH problems with mingw gcc
  • From: "Simonov, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Simonov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
  • From: gcc frickler <gccfrickler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sjlj EH
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sjlj EH
  • From: Zoltán Tóth <zotw1980@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sjlj EH
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• sjlj EH
  • From: Zoltán Tóth <zotw1980@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8 can't find <bits/c++config.h>
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
  • From: gcc frickler <gccfrickler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• g++: duplicate section has different size (only with -march=pentium4, mingw32)
  • From: Frédéric Bron <frederic.bron@xxxxxxx>
• Ongoing Error with runtime libraries building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to use AddressSanitizer of gcc-4.8 on Arm target
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help Ragarding the table of contents
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help Ragarding the table of contents
  • From: Abbas Chunawala <abbas.chunawala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to use AddressSanitizer of gcc-4.8 on Arm target
  • From: "Jungsoo Son" <jungsoo.son@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Pietro Ghillani <ghillo.p@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Method call and calling convention
  • From: Kifa The Great <kifathegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
• LTO : how to specify number of chunks with option -flto-partition=balanced
  • From: Swati Rathi <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SVN checkout failure
  • From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SVN checkout failure
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• SVN checkout failure
  • From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Request
  • From: fomengia glen <gfomengia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
  • From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc trunk bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• MinGW targets & Large Precompiled Headers and 'cc1plus.exe' crash
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• VCG tool
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: passing glob an argument
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• passing glob an argument
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• proposed docs for i386 modifiers for extended asm
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
  • From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
  • From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• extra information in rtx data structure.
  • From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ignored optimization command
  • From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
  • From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
  • From: Beren Oguz <berenoguz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
  • From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
  • From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
  • From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
  • From: Allan Kamau <kamauallan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
  • From: Sylvia <xdwang_tju@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strange errors linking libstdc++.so
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
  • From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Where are the NON extended asm docs?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linking with libs built on older gcc version
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• linking with libs built on older gcc version
  • From: saurabhjain <saurabh.jain2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrap error
  • From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
• Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• C std question: while loop with two tests.
  • From: "Steve Ellcey " <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C Integers
  • From: Jose-Marcio Martins <Jose-Marcio.Martins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C Integers
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: Dan Hitt <dan.hitt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: locking.h
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• locking.h
  • From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: configure failed for installing gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• configure failed for installing gcc
  • From: Brian Lee <brian.h.lee.90@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• how to install libdecnumber?
  • From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New target powerpc64 symbol collision
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• New target powerpc64 symbol collision
  • From: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
  • From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• iterators of a swapped std::list
  • From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8 libgfortran build fail
  • From: David Johnson <da.johnson.a@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ compiler not found
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ compiler not found
  • From: Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ Compiler
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pthread option documentation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++ Compiler
  • From: Scarlbc <scarlbc@xxxxxxxxx>
• pthread option documentation
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling static and shared libraries
  • From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc-help] Cannot find "vms/chfdef.h" while cross-compiling gcc-4.8.0 for alpha
  • From: mehmet basaran <mehmetbasaran89@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
  • From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Generating gimple statements from pragma's
  • From: Julien Peeters <jj.peeters@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc accept invalid ?] copy volatile struct
  • From: Дмитрий Дьяченко <dimhen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC not found
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• C++ compiler not found
  • From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC not found
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC not found
  • From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
  • From: Glen <cnglen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Plugin, pragmas and braces
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Binary literals in C++1y
  • From: Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Kudos!
  • From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reduction of logic to arithmetic
  • From: Ranganath kulkarni <kulkarni137@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• extended asm docs - re-written
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missed optimization when using a structure
  • From: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
  • From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: minix3
  • From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• minix3
  • From: Roger Jowett <rogerjowett@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Plugin, pragmas and braces
  • From: Marco Lattuada <ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: float to int conversion
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• float to int conversion
  • From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Support of non-temporal stores on ia32/Core2?
  • From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@xxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
  • From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ENThomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Low level file access
  • From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Finding the address of a function
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Finding the address of a function
  • From: MARGUINAUD Philippe <philippe.marguinaud@xxxxxxxx>
• Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• --exclude-libs and uninitialized variables
  • From: Srinivas Kommu <kommu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Profiling a dlopened library
  • From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
  • From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• What is the c++11 steady_clock measuring?
  • From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help required
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help required
  • From: sonal <sonalr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm - what does this option do?
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• extended asm - what does this option do?
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
  • From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
• div>mode>3 library calls
  • From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining PCH use
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining PCH use
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining PCH use
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
  • From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
  • From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building Cross GCC 4.6.3 with sysroot.
  • From: Johan Karlsson <Johan.Karlsson@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8 cross compiler help needed
  • From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Power/Energy Awareness in GCC
  • From: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
  • From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
• GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
  • From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cannot stat gcc/include-fixed/limits.h when installing GCC 4.7.2
  • From: "Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott" <pjm@xxxxxxx>
• Catch selecting on exception
  • From: Jan Šebetovský <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [#ILA-980211]: hey
  • From: "General" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
  • From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
• Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
  • From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• set operations on gcov output
  • From: Adam Crain <jadamcrain@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to require an extra register in define_split?
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
  • From: "Jie Jiang" <jiangjie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
  • From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
  • From: James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
• constexpr for C?
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• access specifiers & class inheritance
  • From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C11 support status in GCC?
  • From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
  • From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
  • From: Alan Sayre <ansayre62@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dllexport and inline methods
  • From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
• dllexport and inline methods
  • From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Hacked ipad ,hacked icloud, boviaword@xxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Patricio Calderon <boviaworld@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
  • From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
  • From: "Wood, Tobias" <tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
• "SSE register return with SSE disabled" for unused functionality
  • From: "Симеон Златарев" <simeon.zlatarev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@xxxxxxxxxx>
• optimization based on CPU type or flags?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Regexp in scan-assembler-not
  • From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
  • From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>
• Regexp in scan-assembler-not
  • From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
  • From: charles quarra <charllsnotieneningunputocorreo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default Architecture
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Default Architecture
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build GCC4.8 fail when make
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build GCC4.8 fail when make
  • From: Jerry OELoo <oyljerry@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC-4.8.0 MinGW MIPS cross compiler build fails
  • From: Amir Gonnen <amirgonnen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
  • From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building against another glibc
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building against another glibc
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building against another glibc
  • From: Booty Bootstrapper <e519154@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: "Dudley, David" <ddudley@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Which is the best language for high performance output..
  • From: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
  • From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• extended asm and register clobbers
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
  • From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Alexpux <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default include directories
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• glibc will not compile with -flto
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
  • From: Алексей Павлов <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
• LTO_tags out of range: Range is 0 to 365, value is 1432
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default include directories
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Default include directories
  • From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
  • From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• :: not recognized in 4.1.1
  • From: chinhow <how_lim82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ concept checking
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• atoimic type variants
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ concept checking
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
• lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
  • From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
• Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Another question re asm constraints
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Correct use of "-flto"
  • From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.8 build
  • From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
• 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
  • From: Steven Christensen <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
  • From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Another question re asm constraints
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
  • From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
  • From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
• Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Symbol visibility and namespace
  • From: Dániel Varga <vargad88@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: about inline
  • From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.8.0 bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
  • From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
• about inline
  • From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>