On 26 April 2013 17:40, Brian Budge wrote: > > From my point of view, the layout of the content is much improved. > I'm not an expert with inline assembly, so I can't judge the > correctness of the content. It seems clear that the original > documentation needs work. I think after some formal review, if the > bugs can get worked out, this new document will be great. I know that > when I've used inline assembly in the past, I've had to work from > existing examples, and modify. It would be nice to have the rules all > laid out with examples as they are in this attempt at a replacement. Maybe it could go on the GCC wiki, where it can be corrected as necessary to get it into shape.
