On 15 June 2013 17:11, NightStrike wrote: > > It's not the only way. In fact a much easier way is to use a Canadian cross > to build the native gcc using some other system. Ah, interesting. Does that still use the mingw runtime though?
On 15 June 2013 17:11, NightStrike wrote: > > It's not the only way. In fact a much easier way is to use a Canadian cross > to build the native gcc using some other system. Ah, interesting. Does that still use the mingw runtime though?