On 15 June 2013 14:49, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 15 June 2013 14:18, Ignas wrote: >> Now I'm wondering, what is the most supported and reasonable way to >> compile gcc on windows? without any sdk's, consoles, editors, etc. >> just plain good gcc and its components what would produce native >> windows binaries what do not require some special dlls like cygwin >> does. > > MinGW is the best and also the worst way, it's the only way. But unless you really need to compile it yourself just install a pre-built version and save yourself all the trouble of building it.
