Re: L4Ka. Regression with 4.7 and 4.8 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 11:56 +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Oleg Endo a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 21:38 +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> >> Oleg Endo a écrit :
> >>> The code in idt.c compiled with 4.6 puts static initialization functions
> >>> into the .ctors section, while 4.7 puts them into the .init_array
> >>> section.  Probably this happens only for this single file in the whole
> >>> kernel.  My guess is that the .init_array section is not handled
> >>> properly by the startup code of the kernel.  Or maybe it's even stripped
> >>> out completely (missing in the linker script).  Either way, it seems
> >>> that static initialization for idt.c is not being done properly and thus
> >>> the code crashes.
> >>
> >> 	I don't think that ctors are stripped by linker script. This script is
> >> built by makefile. Here is my script :
> >>
> >>
> >> OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf64-x86-64")
> >> OUTPUT_ARCH("i386:x86-64")
> >> BOOTMEM_SIZE = 1024K;
> >> ...
> >
> > As I initially assumed, the .init_array section seems to be missing in
> > the linker script, so it gets stripped.  The .init_array section has to
> > be handled for code generated by GCC 4.7.  I would say this is an issue
> > of the L4 software, not GCC.
> 
> 	OK. I have done some test since yesterday. I have tried to include 
> .init_array in kernel.
> 
> 	If I modify my linker script like this :
> 
> SECTIONS
> {
>      . = ALIGN(4k);
>      .text _start_text : AT (ADDR(.text) - KERNEL_OFFSET)
>      {
>          *(.text);
>          *(.gnu.linkonce.*);
>          *(.spinlock);
>      }
> 
>      . = ALIGN(4k);
>      .init_array . : AT (ADDR(.init_array) - KERNEL_OFFSET)
>      {
>          PROVIDE_HIDDEN (__init_array_start = .);
>          KEEP (*(SORT(.init_array.*)))
>          KEEP (*(.init_array))
>          PROVIDE_HIDDEN (__init_array_end = .);
>      }
> 
>      . = ALIGN(4k);
>      .rodata . : AT (ADDR(.rodata) - KERNEL_OFFSET)
> ...
> 
> I obtain a kernel with an .init_array section. But result is the same as 
> I suppose that kickstart does not load this new section in memory.
> 
> I have tried to write .init_array in .text section with :
> 
>      .text _start_text : AT (ADDR(.text) - KERNEL_OFFSET)
>      {
>          *(.text);
>          *(.gnu.linkonce.*);
>          *(.spinlock);
>          PROVIDE_HIDDEN (__init_array_start = .);
>          KEEP (*(SORT(.init_array.*)))
>          KEEP (*(.init_array))
>          PROVIDE_HIDDEN (__init_array_end = .);
>      }
> 
> I believe that .init_array is included in text section and loaded by 
> kickstart into memory, but kernel only reboots too.

Simply merging .init_array into .text is not going to produce anything
but some unused data in .text.
.init_array is a vector of function pointers.  These functions are
supposed to be invoked by the startup code before invoking 'main'.
You could try merging .init_array into the existing .ctors and see where
it goes.
BTW, searching the web for ".init_array" gives quite some useful
information.

Cheers,
Oleg





[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux