Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> > I was wondering if the libs in /usr/local/gcc4/lib are being found 
> and they
> > belong to GCC 4.7.3 as opposed to 4.8.0 and .. I see yes, you have mentioned
> > that below.
> 
> It's what I said five days ago in my first reply in this thread :-)

Sorry .. I was very much afk. ( away from keyboard )

> > Generally I tend to stick with a procedure of "test first" then if 
> that looks okay,
> > I install. This is a chicken and egg case where I need to install 
> first and then
> > run tests. Seems reasonable given that changes that have happened in 
> the
> > GCC 4.8.x world.
> 
> It's nothing to do with "changes in the GCC 4.8.x world" it's because
> you're setting LD_RUN_PATH to a location which contains incompatible
> versions of libstdc++.so
> 
> >> Is there a reason you're putting /usr/local/lib in the RPATH? Isn't 
> it
> >> in the default paths searched by ldconfig anyway?
> 
> To answer my own question, no, it isn't.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't bother reading the rest of you mail, since the answer
> to my question is simply "no".

fair enough .. I will go off and redo.

If I haven't said it, and I should, thank you.

dc






[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux