Re: extended asm docs - re-written

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what constitutes a "formal review" for gcc.  Is this something
> driven by the doc maintainers?  Actually, I'm kinda surprised not to have
> heard from them.

They probably haven't seen them.  As described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html , patches are normally sent to
gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx.  Many GCC developers do not read gcc-help.

That said, this is an area that few GCC developers know well.

Ian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux