On 24 April 2013 10:41, dw wrote: > I found the existing docs for extended asm to be unclear and incomplete. > Rather than just complain and hope someone would fix them, I have re-written > them myself. Excellent! That approach is far more likely to succeeed :-) > In general, I wrote a framework to describe the instruction, then cut/pasted > the existing text into the appropriate places in the new doc. This has > resulted in a complete re-write of section 6.41 > (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/Extended-Asm.html) as well as a > few new sub-sections. > > I have generated a patch file for extend.texi > (http://www.LimeGreenSocks.com/gcc/extend.texi.patch), or you can > (temporarily) view the html at > http://www.limegreensocks.com/gcc/Extended-Asm.html. > > No doubt I have violated a dozen of the gcc doc standards, but I believe > that overall, the content and format of the changes are a huge improvement > over the existing text. > > Please let me know what I need to do to have this patch accepted. See http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html for the legal prerequisites and how to submit patches for review.
