Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Andrew Haley" <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
From: lluvia_lists@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lluvia_lists@xxxxxxxxxxx, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51A4DC0A.8070906@redhat.com>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13

> That's what you want -march=generic for.

I wanted to be sure if that could be the cause of some wrong (integer)
numerical results which are producing my program.

References:
- -march=native between different X86_64 families
  - From: lluvia_lists
- Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
  - From: Andrew Haley

Prev by Date: Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
Next by Date: Re: Plugin: global vs global static in c/c++ AST representation
Previous by thread: Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
Next by thread: Re: -march=native between different X86_64 families
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux