On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:24 PM, James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Do any Harvard architecture targets attempt support for trampolines? > > It seems that some limited support is feasible, but if every other > Harvard architecture bails on trampolines, I'll follow the pack. On a true Harvard architecture, for which there is absolutely no way to write data to the instruction memory, then trampolines are fairly difficult to implement. Most systems like that do not bother to implement trampolines. That said, on a true Harvard architecture you normally have control over the ABI. And that means that you can use a slightly unusual representation of a function pointer: you can make a function pointer be a pointer to a function descriptor. Most ABIs on the PPC do this. The descriptor contains (at least) two words: a pointer to the code in instruction memory, and a value to load into the static chain register before jumping to that code. Calling a function pointer becomes a multi-instruction sequence: load the static chain register and then branch to the code. With this approach, trampolines do not require writing into instruction memory. Ian
